Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37045942›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2023

Matched related versus unrelated versus haploidentical donors for allogeneic transplantation in AML patients achieving first complete remission after two induction courses: a study from the ALWP/EBMT.

Arnon Nagler, Myriam Labopin, Stephan Mielke, Jakob Passweg, Didier Blaise, Tobias Gedde-Dahl, Jan J Cornelissen, Urpu Salmenniemi, Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha, Péter Reményi and 10 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Arnon NaglerDivision of Hematology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel. arnon.nagler@sheba.health.gov.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0763-1265
Myriam LabopinEBMT Paris Study Office, Department of Hematology, Saint Antoine Hospital, INSERM UMR 938, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Stephan MielkeDepartment of Cell Therapy and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (CAST), Department of Laboratory Medicine (LabMED), Karolinska University Hospital and Institutet, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jakob PasswegUniversity Hospital Hematology, Basel, Switzerland.
Didier BlaiseProgramme de Transplantation & Therapie Cellulaire, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5684-9447
Tobias Gedde-DahlClinic for Cancer Medicine, Hematology Department, Section for Stem Cell Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Jan J CornelissenDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Urpu SalmenniemiHUCH Comprehensive Cancer Center, Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Helsinki, Finland.
Ibrahim Yakoub-AghaCHU de Lille LIRIC, INSERM U995, Université de Lille, Lille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4524-8782
Péter ReményiDepartment of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant, Dél-pesti Centrumkórház - Országos Hematológiai és Infektológiai Intézet, Budapest, Hungary.
Gerard SociéDepartment of Hematology - BMT, Hôpital St. Louis, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2114-7533
Gwendolyn van GorkomDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hélène Labussière-WalletCentre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Service Hematologie, Lyon, France.
Xiao-Jun HuangPeking University People's Hospital, Institute of Haematology, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Marie Thérèse RubioCHRU BRABOIS, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France.
Jenny ByrneNottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK.
Charles CraddockDepartment of Haematology, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5041-6678
Laimonas GriškevičiusVilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Haematology, Oncology & Transfusion Center, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Fabio CiceriHematology & Bone Marrow Transplant, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0873-0123
Mohamad MohtyEBMT Paris Study Office, Department of Hematology, Saint Antoine Hospital, INSERM UMR 938, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7264-808X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared transplants (HSCT) from matched related siblings (MSD) with those from matched 10/10 and mismatched 9/10 unrelated (UD) and T-replete haploidentical (Haplo) donors in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) achieved after two inductions, a known poor prognostic factor. One thousand two hundred and ninety-five patients were included: MSD (n = 428), UD 10/10 (n = 554), UD 9/10 (n = 135), and Haplo (n = 178). Acute GVHD II-IV was higher in all groups compared to MSD. Extensive chronic (c) GVHD was significantly higher in UD 9/10 (HR = 2.52; 95% CI 1.55-4.11, p = 0.0002) and UD 10/10 (HR = 1.48; 95% CI 1.03-2.13, p = 0.036) and cGVHD all grades were higher in UD 9/10 vs MSD (HR = 1.77; 95% CI 1.26-2.49, p = 0.0009). Non-relapse mortality was higher in all groups compared to MSD. Relapse incidence, leukemia-free, and overall survival did not differ significantly between donor types. Finally, GVHD-free relapse-free survival was lower in HSCT from UD 9/10 (HR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.20-2.03, p = 0.0009) but not in those from UD 10/10 (HR = 1.13, p = 0.22) and Haplo donors (HR = 1.12, p = 0.43) compared to MSD. In conclusion, in AML patients undergoing HSCT in CR1 achieved after two induction courses 10/10 UD and Haplo but not 9/10 UD donors are comparable alternatives to MSD.

Indexed as

Graft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteHumansRecurrenceRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesSiblingsTransplantation, HomologousUnrelated Donors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.