ArticleScientific reports2023
Establishment of an artificial particulate matter-induced lung disease model through analyzing pathological changes and transcriptomic profiles in mice.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Establishment of a chronic aspiration pneumonia mouse model using oropharyngeal aspiration of food suspension.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Pollutant-regulated mitophagy: new perspectives in environmental toxicology.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026Review
- Xenobiotic Toxicants and Particulate Matter: Effects, Mechanisms, Impacts on Human Health, and Mitigation Strategies.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Review
- Article
- Impact assessment of spatial-temporal distribution of riverine dust on air quality using remote sensing data and numerical modeling.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Particulate matter (PM), an environmental risk factor, is linked with health risks such as respiratory diseases. This study aimed to establish an animal model of PM-induced lung injury with artificial PM (APM) and identify the potential of APM for toxicological research. APM was generated from graphite at 600 °C and combined with ethylene. We analyzed diesel exhaust particulate (DEP) and APM compositions and compared toxicity and transcriptomic profiling in lungs according to the exposure. For the animal study, C57BL/6 male mice were intratracheally administered vehicle, DEP, or APM. DEP or APM increased relative lung weight, inflammatory cell numbers, and inflammatory protein levels compared with the vehicle control. Histological assessments showed an increase in particle-pigment alveolar macrophages and slight inflammation in the lungs of DEP and APM mice. In the only APM group, granulomatous inflammation, pulmonary fibrosis, and mucous hyperplasia were observed in the lungs of some individuals. This is the first study to compare pulmonary toxicity between DEP and APM in an animal model. Our results suggest that the APM-treated animal model may contribute to understanding the harmful effects of PM in toxicological studies showing that APM can induce various lung diseases according to different doses of APM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.