ReviewThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2023
Explainability and causability in digital pathology.
Review in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed.
- An interpretable deep learning framework for multiclass bone marrow cytomorphology classification using EfficientNet and post hoc visualization techniques.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in oncology: empowering clinicians for responsible integration.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Review
- Agentic systems in computational pathology: architectures, evidence, and translational challenges.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in pathology: a framework for preserving brain capital in the diagnostic apex.Croatian medical journal · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Dermatopathology: An Update and Review of the Current Literature.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence reshaping the paradigm of hematologic malignancy diagnosis and treatment: From static assessment to dynamic precision management.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- AI-Based Methods in Neuropathology for Diagnosis and Treatment of Brain Tumors.European journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Adaptive example selection for prototype based explainable mitosis detection in digital pathology.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Debating the pros and cons of computational pathology at the European Congress of Pathology (ECP) 2024.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Enhancing WSI image classification with graph convolutional neural networks and model uncertainty modeling.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Quantitative HER2 Scoring and Spatial Bystander Effect Modeling for ADC Response Stratification in HER2-Low Breast Cancer.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Review
- Computational pathology in breast cancer: optimizing molecular prediction through task-oriented AI models.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Review
- Unveiling the Algorithm: The Role of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Modern Surgery.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- How Well Will AI Help Recognize Voice Disorders? A State-of-the-art Review of Current Acoustic Assessment Strategies and Future Applications.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2025Review
- Combined neocortical protein and morphological profiling of reactive microglia across Alzheimer's and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2025Article
- Aligning computational pathology with clinical practice for colorectal cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Review
- Pathologist-interpretable breast cancer subtyping and stratification from AI-inferred nuclear features.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Enhanced metastasis risk prediction in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma using deep learning and computational histopathology.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Computational pathology in the age of artificial intelligence - embrace not fear.The journal of pathology. Clinical research · 2025Review
- Recent Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Bladder Cancer: A Review.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The current move towards digital pathology enables pathologists to use artificial intelligence (AI)-based computer programmes for the advanced analysis of whole slide images. However, currently, the best-performing AI algorithms for image analysis are deemed black boxes since it remains - even to their developers - often unclear why the algorithm delivered a particular result. Especially in medicine, a better understanding of algorithmic decisions is essential to avoid mistakes and adverse effects on patients. This review article aims to provide medical experts with insights on the issue of explainability in digital pathology. A short introduction to the relevant underlying core concepts of machine learning shall nurture the reader's understanding of why explainability is a specific issue in this field. Addressing this issue of explainability, the rapidly evolving research field of explainable AI (XAI) has developed many techniques and methods to make black-box machine-learning systems more transparent. These XAI methods are a first step towards making black-box AI systems understandable by humans. However, we argue that an explanation interface must complement these explainable models to make their results useful to human stakeholders and achieve a high level of causability, i.e. a high level of causal understanding by the user. This is especially relevant in the medical field since explainability and causability play a crucial role also for compliance with regulatory requirements. We conclude by promoting the need for novel user interfaces for AI applications in pathology, which enable contextual understanding and allow the medical expert to ask interactive 'what-if'-questions. In pathology, such user interfaces will not only be important to achieve a high level of causability. They will also be crucial for keeping the human-in-the-loop and bringing medical experts' experience and conceptual knowledge to AI processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.