Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37045770›Full record

ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2023

Additional Effect of High-output Current and/or High-duty Cycle in Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Adolescent/Adult Intractable Epilepsy.

Kentaro Tamura, Ryota Sasaki, Takafumi Sakakibara, Riju Dahal, Yasuhiro Takeshima, Ryosuke Matsuda, Shuichi Yamada, Fumihiko Nishimura, Ichiro Nakagawa, Young-Soo Park and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kentaro TamuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University.
Ryota SasakiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University.
Takafumi SakakibaraEpilepsy Center, National Hospital Organization Nara Medical Center.
Riju DahalDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University.
Yasuhiro TakeshimaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University.
Ryosuke MatsudaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University.
Shuichi YamadaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University.
Fumihiko NishimuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University.
Ichiro NakagawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University.
Young-Soo ParkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University.
Hidehiro HirabayashiEpilepsy Center, National Hospital Organization Nara Medical Center.
Hiroyuki NakaseDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) device delivers electrical pulses to the vagus nerve at a rhythm defined by the duty cycle. The standard therapeutic range is advocated for an output current of 1.5-2.25 mA and a duty cycle of 10%. As the optimal settings vary from patient to patient, some patients may benefit from additional seizure reduction when stimulated beyond the standard range. A total of 74 patients (15 children aged <12 years and 59 adolescents/adults) who underwent VNS implantation between 2011 and 2020 and who were followed up for at least 2 years were included in this retrospective study. Stimulation parameters exceeding 2.25 mA of output current, 25% of duty cycle, and 0.5625 (2.25 mA × 25%) of current × duty cycle were defined as high stimulation. The proportion achieved an additional seizure reduction of 20%, and the 50% seizure reduction rate at the last follow-up was compared between adolescents/adults and children. Approximately 40% of patients in adolescents/adults treated with high stimulation experienced an additional acute effect, resulting in a 50% or greater reduction in seizures in almost all patients. Moreover, in adolescents/adults, 22.2%-41.9% of the patients were treated with high stimulation, and the responder rate was 69.5%. Conversely, the responder rate in children was 26.7%, significantly worse than that in adolescents/adults, despite higher stimulation. VNS with high-stimulation settings is effective for adolescent and adult patients with intractable epilepsy. Even high stimulation may not be effective in extremely refractory pediatric epilepsy with a high seizure frequency.

Indexed as

Drug Resistant EpilepsyVagus Nerve StimulationAdolescentAdultChildHumansRetrospective StudiesSeizuresTreatment OutcomeVagus Nervedrug-resistant epilepsyhigh-duty cyclehigh-output currentvagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID37045770
PMCPMC10406457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.