Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37045564›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Mental health issues and illness and substance use disorder (non-)disclosure to a supervisor: a cross-sectional study on beliefs, attitudes and needs of military personnel.

Rebecca Bogaers, Elbert Geuze, Jaap van Weeghel, Fenna Leijten, D van de Mheen, N Greenberg, A D Rozema, Evelien Brouwers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rebecca BogaersTranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg University, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg, The Netherlands r.i.bogaers@tilburguniversity.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3908-9861
Elbert GeuzeBrain Research and Innovation Centre, Dutch Ministry of Defence, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3479-2379
Jaap van WeeghelTranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg University, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Fenna LeijtenDirectorate-General of Policy, Directorate of Strategy and Knowledge, Dutch Ministry of Defence, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
D van de MheenTranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg University, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
N GreenbergKing's Centre for Military Health Research, King's College London, London, UK.
A D RozemaTranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg University, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Evelien BrouwersTranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg University, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesResearch suggests that military personnel frequently delay disclosing mental health issues and illness (MHI), including substance use disorder, to supervisors. This delay causes missed opportunities for support and workplace accommodations which may help to avoid adverse occupational outcomes. The current study aims to examine disclosure-related beliefs, attitudes and needs, to create a better understanding of personnel's disclosure decision making.

designA cross-sectional questionnaire study among military personnel with and without MHI. Beliefs, attitudes and needs regarding the (non-)disclosure decision to a supervisor were examined, including factors associated with (non-)disclosure intentions and decisions. Descriptive and regression (logistic and ordinal) analyses were performed.

settingThe study took place within the Dutch military.

participantsMilitary personnel with MHI (n=324) and without MHI (n=554) were participated in this study. OUTCOME MEASURE: (Non-)disclosure intentions and decisions.

resultsCommon beliefs and attitudes

conclusionTo facilitate (early-)disclosure to a supervisor, creating opportunities for workplace support, interventions should focus on decreasing stigma and discrimination and align with personnels' preference for self-management. Furthermore, training is needed for supervisors on how to recognise, and effectively communicate with, personnel with MHI. Focus should also be on improving supervisor-employee relationships.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMilitary PersonnelSubstance-Related DisordersAttitudeCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMental HealthSocial StigmaMENTAL HEALTHOCCUPATIONAL & INDUSTRIAL MEDICINEPREVENTIVE MEDICINEPSYCHIATRYSubstance misuse

Identifiers

PMID37045564
PMCPMC10105997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.