ArticleBiochemistry2023
Lysine Deacetylase Substrate Selectivity: Distinct Interaction Surfaces Drive Positive and Negative Selection for Residues Following Acetyllysine.
Article in Biochemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Origins of Catalysis in Non-Heme Fe(II)/2-Oxoglutarate-Dependent Histone Lysine Demethylase KDM4A with Differently Methylated Histone H3 Peptides.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- Endogenous expression of inactive lysine deacetylases reveals deacetylation-dependent cellular mechanisms.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Lysine acetylation is a post-translational modification that is reversed by lysine deacetylases (KDACs). The goal of this work was to identify determinants of substrate specificity for KDACs, focusing on short-range interactions occurring with residues immediately following the acetyllysine. Using a fluorescence-based in vitro assay, we determined the activity for each enzyme with a limited panel of derivative substrate peptides, revealing a distinct reactivity profile for each enzyme. We mapped the interaction surface for KDAC6, KDAC8, and KDAC1 with the +1 and +2 substrate residues (with respect to acetyllysine) based on enzyme-substrate interaction pairs observed in molecular dynamics simulations. Characteristic residues in each KDAC interact preferentially with particular substrate residues and correlate with either enhanced or inhibited activity. Although nonpolar aromatic residues generally enhanced activity with all KDACs, the manner in which each enzyme interacted with these residues is distinct. Furthermore, each KDAC has distinctive interactions that correlate with lower activity, primarily ionic in nature. KDAC8 exhibited the most diverse and widest range of effects, while KDAC6 was sensitive only to the +1 position and KDAC1 selectivity was primarily driven by negative selection. The substrate preferences were validated for KDAC6 and KDAC8 using a set of peptides derived from known acetylated proteins. Overall, we determined how KDAC6, KDAC8, and KDAC1 achieve substrate specificity with residues following the acetyllysine. These new insights into KDAC specificity will be critical for identifying novel substrates of particular KDACs, designing KDAC-specific inhibitors, and demonstrate a general framework for understanding substrate specificity for other enzyme classes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.