Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37043527›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2023

A randomized trial of safety, acceptability and adherence of three rectal microbicide placebo formulations among young sexual and gender minorities who engage in receptive anal intercourse (MTN-035).

Jose A Bauermeister, Clara Dominguez Islas, Yuqing Jiao, Ryan Tingler, Elizabeth Brown, Jillian Zemanek, Rebecca Giguere, Ivan Balan, Sherri Johnson, Nicole Macagna and 15 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Jose A BauermeisterFamily and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9276-2306
Clara Dominguez IslasStatistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research & Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Yuqing JiaoStatistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research & Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Ryan TinglerFamily and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Elizabeth BrownStatistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research & Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Jillian ZemanekStatistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research & Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Rebecca GiguereCenter for Translational Behavioral Science, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, Florida, United States of America.
Ivan BalanCenter for Translational Behavioral Science, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, Florida, United States of America.
Sherri JohnsonFHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Nicole MacagnaFHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jonathan LucasFHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Matthew RoseFHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Cindy JacobsonMagee-Women's Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Clare CollinsMagee-Women's Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Edward LivantMagee-Women's Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4302-3950
Devika SinghMagee-Women's Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Ken HoDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Craig HoesleyUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.
Albert LiuSan Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Noel KayangeJohns Hopkins University Research Project, Blantyre, Malawi.
Thesla Palanee-PhillipsWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, School of Public Health, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Suwat ChariyalertsakResearch Institute for Health Sciences, Faculty of Public Health, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Pedro GonzalesIMPACTA, San Miguel, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-2610-0136
Jeanna PiperDivision of AIDS/NIAID/NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
MTN-035 Protocol Team

Funding

Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI068633 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI HILLIER, SHARON L. · 2011 to 2021
$175.0M
Microbicide Trials NetworkU01AI068633 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI HILLIER, SHARON L. · 2006 to 2010
$77.0M
Statistical and Data Management Center (SDMC): Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI068615 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BROWN, ELIZABETH RENATA · 2011 to 2021
$66.5M
WG3: HIV, Co-infections and Co-morbiditiesP30AI036219 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Immaculate Lillian Nankya · 1994 to 2026
$50.0M
The Malawi Clinical Trials UnitUM1AI069518 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JACKY M JENNINGS, TAHA E TAHA · 2012 to 2026
$43.8M
University of Pittsburgh Clinical Trials UnitUM1AI069494 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SUSAN L KOLETAR, John W Mellors · 2012 to 2026
$38.0M
Wits HIV Research Group CLINICAL TRIAL UNIT (CTU) reapplicationUM1AI069463 · NIAID · WITS HEALTH CONSORTIUM (PTY), LTD · PI REES, HELEN, SANNE, IAN MATTHIAS · 2012 to 2025
$31.8M
San Francisco Vaccine and Prevention UnitUM1AI069496 · NIAID · PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES · PI Susan Buchbinder, Diane V Havlir · 2012 to 2026
$30.5M
Laboratory Center (LC): Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI106707 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI MELLORS, JOHN W, ROHAN, LISA CENCIA · 2014 to 2021
$27.1M
Thailand HIV/AIDS and Infectious Disease Clinical Trials Unit (THAI CTU)UM1AI069399 · NIAID · CHIANG MAI UNIVERSITY · PI Kiat Ruxrungtham, Khuanchai Supparatpinyo · 2012 to 2026
$25.0M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI036219NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068633NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068615NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068633NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069399NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069463NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069494NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069496NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069518NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI106707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efforts to develop a range of HIV prevention products that can serve as behaviorally congruent viable alternatives to consistent condom use and oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) remain crucial. MTN-035 was a randomized crossover trial seeking to evaluate the safety, acceptability, and adherence to three placebo modalities (insert, suppository, enema) prior to receptive anal intercourse (RAI). If participants had no RAI in a week, they were asked to use their assigned product without sex. We hypothesized that the modalities would be acceptable and safe for use prior to RAI, and that participants would report high adherence given their behavioral congruence with cleansing practices (e.g., douches and/or enemas) and their existing use to deliver medications (e.g., suppositories; fast-dissolving inserts) via the rectum. Participants (N = 217) were sexual and gender minorities enrolled in five different countries (Malawi, Peru, South Africa, Thailand, and the United States of America). Mean age was 24.9 years (range 18-35 years). 204 adverse events were reported by 98 participants (45.2%); 37 (18.1%) were deemed related to the study products. The proportion of participants reporting "high acceptability" was 72% (95%CI: 65% - 78%) for inserts, 66% (95%CI: 59% - 73%) for suppositories, and 73% (95%CI: 66% - 79%) for enemas. The proportion of participants reporting fully adherent per protocol (i.e., at least one use per week) was 75% (95%CI: 69% - 81%) for inserts, 74% (95%CI: 68% - 80%) for suppositories, and 83% (95%CI: 77% - 88%) for enemas. Participants fully adherent per RAI-act was similar among the three products: insert (n = 99; 58.9%), suppository (n = 101; 58.0%) and enema (n = 107; 58.8%). The efficacy and effectiveness of emerging HIV prevention drug depends on safe and acceptable delivery modalities that are easy to use consistently. Our findings demonstrate the safety and acceptability of, and adherence to, enemas, inserts, and suppositories as potential modalities through which to deliver a rectal microbicide.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexual and Gender MinoritiesAdolescentAdultHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleRectumSexual BehaviorSuppositoriesYoung AdultAnti-Infective AgentsSuppositories

Identifiers

PMID37043527
PMCPMC10096248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.