ArticlePloS one2023
Evaluating diagnostic content of AI-generated chest radiography: A multi-center visual Turing test.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complementary Error Profiles of Human Readers and Large Language Models in Detecting AI-Generated Chest Radiographs: A Comparative Reader Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Synthetic cervical spine radiographs: expert validation and transfer learning for low-data settings.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Multimodal artificial intelligence in glioma management: integrating neuroimaging and hematologic biomarkers for precision oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Detectability and healthcare implications of generative AI-synthesized chest radiographs: a blinded radiologist reader study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating AI-based comprehensive clinical decision support for sepsis and ARDS: protocol for a Clinician Turing Test.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Direct shoulder MR arthrography using an iron-based positive T1 contrast agent (NEMO-103): comparison of image quality with gadolinium-based contrast.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- External Testing of a Deep Learning Model to Estimate Biologic Age Using Chest Radiographs.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- AI-Driven Thoracic X-ray Diagnostics: Transformative Transfer Learning for Clinical Validation in Pulmonary Radiography.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Structurally constrained and pathology-aware convolutional transformer generative adversarial network for virtual histology staining of human coronary optical coherence tomography images.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- Assessing the role of GPT-4 in thyroid ultrasound diagnosis and treatment recommendations: enhancing interpretability with a chain of thought approach.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Clinical applications of generative artificial intelligence in radiology: image translation, synthesis, and text generation.BJR artificial intelligence · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate interpretation of chest radiographs requires years of medical training, and many countries face a shortage of medical professionals to meet such requirements. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have aided diagnoses; however, their performance is often limited due to data imbalance. The aim of this study was to augment imbalanced medical data using generative adversarial networks (GANs) and evaluate the clinical quality of the generated images via a multi-center visual Turing test.
methodsUsing six chest radiograph datasets, (MIMIC, CheXPert, CXR8, JSRT, VBD, and OpenI), starGAN v2 generated chest radiographs with specific pathologies. Five board-certified radiologists from three university hospitals, each with at least five years of clinical experience, evaluated the image quality through a visual Turing test. Further evaluations were performed to investigate whether GAN augmentation enhanced the convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier performances.
resultsIn terms of identifying GAN images as artificial, there was no significant difference in the sensitivity between radiologists and random guessing (result of radiologists: 147/275 (53.5%) vs result of random guessing: 137.5/275, (50%); p = .284). GAN augmentation enhanced CNN classifier performance by 11.7%.
conclusionRadiologists effectively classified chest pathologies with synthesized radiographs, suggesting that the images contained adequate clinical information. Furthermore, GAN augmentation enhanced CNN performance, providing a bypass to overcome data imbalance in medical AI training. CNN based methods rely on the amount and quality of training data; the present study showed that GAN augmentation could effectively augment training data for medical AI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.