Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37043456›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Evaluating diagnostic content of AI-generated chest radiography: A multi-center visual Turing test.

Youho Myong, Dan Yoon, Byeong Soo Kim, Young Gyun Kim, Yongsik Sim, Suji Lee, Jiyoung Yoon, Minwoo Cho, Sungwan Kim

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Youho MyongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dan YoonInterdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Byeong Soo KimInterdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young Gyun KimInterdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1231-9097
Yongsik SimDepartment of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2711-2793
Suji LeeDepartment of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jiyoung YoonDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Minwoo ChoTransdisciplinary Department of Medicine and Advanced Technology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sungwan KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9318-849X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate interpretation of chest radiographs requires years of medical training, and many countries face a shortage of medical professionals to meet such requirements. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have aided diagnoses; however, their performance is often limited due to data imbalance. The aim of this study was to augment imbalanced medical data using generative adversarial networks (GANs) and evaluate the clinical quality of the generated images via a multi-center visual Turing test.

methodsUsing six chest radiograph datasets, (MIMIC, CheXPert, CXR8, JSRT, VBD, and OpenI), starGAN v2 generated chest radiographs with specific pathologies. Five board-certified radiologists from three university hospitals, each with at least five years of clinical experience, evaluated the image quality through a visual Turing test. Further evaluations were performed to investigate whether GAN augmentation enhanced the convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier performances.

resultsIn terms of identifying GAN images as artificial, there was no significant difference in the sensitivity between radiologists and random guessing (result of radiologists: 147/275 (53.5%) vs result of random guessing: 137.5/275, (50%); p = .284). GAN augmentation enhanced CNN classifier performance by 11.7%.

conclusionRadiologists effectively classified chest pathologies with synthesized radiographs, suggesting that the images contained adequate clinical information. Furthermore, GAN augmentation enhanced CNN performance, providing a bypass to overcome data imbalance in medical AI training. CNN based methods rely on the amount and quality of training data; the present study showed that GAN augmentation could effectively augment training data for medical AI.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeural Networks, ComputerCertificationHospitals, UniversityHumansRadiography

Identifiers

PMID37043456
PMCPMC10096231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.