Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37043446›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Gender in public health research: Reflections on design and process across four research projects in low-and middle-income countries.

Marta S Palmeirim, Séverine Erismann, Andrea Leuenberger, Monica Berger-González, Sally Mtenga, Somphou Sayasone, Peter Odermatt, Helen Prytherch, Claire Somerville

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Marta S PalmeirimSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4709-2489
Séverine ErismannSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Andrea LeuenbergerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6116-148X
Monica Berger-GonzálezUniversity of the Valley of Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8650-989X
Sally MtengaIfakara Health Institute, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6100-7562
Somphou SayasoneLao Tropical and Public Health Institute, Ministry of Health, Vientiane, Lao People's Democratic Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8219-9567
Peter OdermattSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0296-2508
Helen PrytherchSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Claire SomervilleGraduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2335-160X
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHGraduate Institute of International and Development Studies · CHIfakara Health Institute · TZMinistry of Health · LAUniversidad del Valle de Guatemala · GT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing body of work clearly documents the gendered inequalities in health. The COVID-19 pandemic further exposed these deep inequities: men appear to be more vulnerable to poorer outcomes, but most of the global health workforce is female who are at increased risk of exposure to hospital infection. However, researchers often fail to adequately embed gender as part of the public health research. This paper reports findings from a synthesis exercise that identified some of the challenges of integrating gender in the design and processes of research studies in four projects conducted in six low- and middle-income countries. Through a collective retrospective meta-synthesis process with researchers from each project, we identified two main themes; (i) we deep dive on two of the structural pillars of conducting public health research (design and process) and (ii) we describe some of the underlying opportunities and resistances to the integration of a gender perspective in these research projects. In conclusion, we suggest that public health funding bodies require researchers to integrate gender in public health research from early on as part of the design and to conduct gendered analysis, as part of the overall drive towards more equitable health systems delivery.

Identifiers

PMID37043446
PMCPMC10096266
OpenAlexW4365135737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.