Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37043332›Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2023

Bioinspired Framework Catalysts: From Enzyme Immobilization to Biomimetic Catalysis.

Kun-Yu Wang, Jiaqi Zhang, Yu-Chuan Hsu, Hengyu Lin, Zongsu Han, Jiandong Pang, Zhentao Yang, Rong-Ran Liang, Wei Shi, Hong-Cai Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Eutectozymes as Soft Hybrid Materials for Advanced Biocatalysis.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Isolated and HNature chemistry · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kun-Yu WangDepartment of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8982-0547
Jiaqi ZhangDepartment of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States.
Yu-Chuan HsuDepartment of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States.
Hengyu LinDepartment of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States.
Zongsu HanDepartment of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States.
Jiandong PangDepartment of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7546-5580
Zhentao YangDepartment of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States.
Rong-Ran LiangDepartment of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States.
Wei ShiDepartment of Chemistry, Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy Materials Chemistry (MOE) and Renewable Energy Conversion and Storage Center (RECAST), College of Chemistry, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6130-1227
Hong-Cai ZhouDepartment of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9029-3788

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enzymatic catalysis has fueled considerable interest from chemists due to its high efficiency and selectivity. However, the structural complexity and vulnerability hamper the application potentials of enzymes. Driven by the practical demand for chemical conversion, there is a long-sought quest for bioinspired catalysts reproducing and even surpassing the functions of natural enzymes. As nanoporous materials with high surface areas and crystallinity, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) represent an exquisite case of how natural enzymes and their active sites are integrated into porous solids, affording bioinspired heterogeneous catalysts with superior stability and customizable structures. In this review, we comprehensively summarize the advances of bioinspired MOFs for catalysis, discuss the design principle of various MOF-based catalysts, such as MOF-enzyme composites and MOFs embedded with active sites, and explore the utility of these catalysts in different reactions. The advantages of MOFs as enzyme mimetics are also highlighted, including confinement, templating effects, and functionality, in comparison with homogeneous supramolecular catalysts. A perspective is provided to discuss potential solutions addressing current challenges in MOF catalysis.

Indexed as

BiomimeticsMetal-Organic FrameworksCatalysisCatalytic DomainPorosityMetal-Organic Frameworks

Identifiers

PMID37043332
PMCPMC10853941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.