ArticleJAMA surgery2023
Effect of Smartphone App Postoperative Home Monitoring After Oncologic Surgery on Quality of Recovery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in JAMA surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03456167 (Mobile App Postoperative Home Monitoring After Enhanced Recovery Oncologic Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Mobile App Postoperative Home Monitoring After Enhanced Recovery Oncologic Surgery
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of Remote Patient Monitoring on Health Care Utilization in Patients With Noncommunicable Diseases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness of smartphone app-based interventions after surgery on quality of recovery among cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Medico-Economic Evaluation of a Telehealth Platform for Elective Outpatient Surgeries: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Trial
- Technical Feasibility of a Multimodal Electro-Optical and Infrared Imaging Pipeline for Postoperative Wound Assessment After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Formative Evaluation Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- VISUCHIR 2024 Ecological Benchmarking of French Private Centers Using a Perioperative Digital Therapeutic: Descriptive Early-Adopter Comparison.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Patients' expectations and barriers towards postoperative telehealth follow-up after oncologic breast surgery in France.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Addition of a surgery-specific module to a perioperative, telemedicine program for improving functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized study.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Article
- Perioperative fatigue after lung resection for pulmonary nodules and early-stage lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Digital Health Literacy and Tool Adoption in Postoperative Care in a Safety-Net Hospital Population: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Unplanned Emergency Department Visits Within 90 Days of Breast Reduction Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Structured proactive nutritional care delivered via a digital follow-up platform is associated with better postoperative outcomes in gastric cancer patients after radical gastrectomy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Impact of a digital pre- and rehabilitation program on postoperative outcomes after pelvic gynecological surgery.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Patients' Usability Experience With a Postoperative Follow-Up Web Application.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
- Discharge with a smartphone application for follow-up after day care surgery: a randomised controlled trial.BJA open · 2025Article
- Review
- The efficacy of a symptom management platform among gastric cancer survivors: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.International journal of surgery protocols · 2025Article
- Development and Implementation of a Personal Virtual Assistant for Patient Engagement and Communication in Postsurgical Cancer Care: Feasibility Cohort Study.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- Patients' Experienced Usability and Satisfaction With Digital Health Solutions in a Home Setting: Instrument Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Innovative approach to designing user-centred digital solutions for plastic surgery patients with non-melanoma skin cancer.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Surgical Decision-Making: An Updated and Comprehensive Overview of Precision and Personalization in Current Evidence.Cancer management and research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: There has been an increase in health care-focused smartphone apps, including those for encouraging healthy behaviors and managing chronic conditions, but app-assisted postsurgical care has yet to be fully explored. Objective: To compare quality of recovery and patient satisfaction between conventional in-person follow-up and smartphone app-assisted follow-up for patients following Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society (ERAS) protocols. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial, conducted from June 2019 to April 2021, included women older than 18 years undergoing oncologic breast reconstruction or major gynecologic oncology surgery following ERAS protocols with the care of 2 surgeons at an academic tertiary care center. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive smartphone app-assisted follow-up or conventional in-person follow-up. The smartphone group used a surgeon-monitored app to record Quality of Recovery 15 (QoR15) scores, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-selected adverse events, drain outputs, and surgical site photographs over 6 weeks. Patient satisfaction scores were assessed using validated Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire III (PSQ-III) subscales at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. The conventional follow-up group also completed the QoR15 and PSQ-III questionnaires at these intervals. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were quality of recovery and patient satisfaction, as measured by the QoR15 and PSQ-III, respectively. Secondary outcomes were costs of follow-up; the number of contacts with the medical system, complications, and surgeons' contacts with patients; and surgeons' perceptions of app-assisted care. Results: Of 72 patients included in the trial, 36 underwent breast reconstruction (mean [SD] age, 45.30 [9.13] years) and 36 underwent gynecologic oncology surgery (mean [SD] age, 54.90 [11.18] years). Three patients dropped out (2 who underwent breast reconstruction [1 in the app group, 1 in the control group], 1 who underwent gynecologic oncology surgery [control group]). The app group had significantly higher mean (SD) QoR15 scores than the control group (2 weeks: 127.58 [22.03] vs 117.68 [17.52], P = .02; 6 weeks: 136.64 [17.53] vs 129.76 [16.42], P = .03). Patients were equally satisfied between groups in all subsets of the PSQ-III at these intervals. The mean (SD) number of complications was similar in both groups, and a similar number of surgeon contacts per patient occurred (1.6 [1.2] vs 2.1 [2.0], P = .16). Surgeons appreciated early identification of complications with the app. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, postoperative follow-up for patients undergoing breast reconstruction and gynecologic oncology surgery using smartphone app-assisted monitoring led to improved quality of recovery and equal satisfaction with care compared with conventional in-person follow-up. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03456167.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.