Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37043181›Full record

ArticleFamily medicine2023

More Than Half of Family Medicine Clerkships Do Not Address Systemic Racism: A CERA Study.

Kristina M Bridges, Kathryn Rampon, Natabhona Mabachi, Wendi Born, Amanda Kost, Daniel J Parente, Laurel B Witt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Making DEIA Decisions-Together.Family medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Stages of Development.Family medicine · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kristina M BridgesDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS. †Drs Bridges and Rampon contributed equally to this study.
Kathryn RamponDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.
Natabhona MabachiDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.
Wendi BornDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.
Amanda KostDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Daniel J ParenteDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.
Laurel B WittDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe influence of racism in medicine is increasingly acknowledged, and the negative effect of systemic racism on individual and population health is well established. Yet, little is known about how or whether medical students are being educated on this topic. This study investigated the presence and features of curricula related to systemic racism in North American family medicine clerkships.

methodsWe conducted a survey of North American family medicine clerkship directors as part of the 2021 Council of Academic Family Medicine's Educational Research Alliance (CERA) survey.

resultsThe survey response rate was 49% (78/160). Almost all clerkship directors agreed (n=68; 97.1%) that teaching about racism at all levels of medical education was appropriate. Yet, 60% (n=42) of family medicine clerkship directors reported no formalized curriculum for teaching about racism or bias. Teaching about systemic racism was more likely to be present in the family medicine clerkship at institutions where clerkship directors reported that faculty receive 5 or more hours of training in racism and bias, as compared to institutions where faculty receive 4 or fewer hours of training in racism/bias (odds ratio 2.82, 95% CI 1.05-8.04, P=.045). Programs reported using racism in medicine curricula based in cultural competency (20%); structural competency (10%); both cultural and structural competency (31%); and neither or uncertain (40%). Clerkship directors reported high faculty, student, and institutional engagement in addressing systemic racism. We did not find an association between underrepresented in medicine director identity and racism curricula.

conclusionsIn more than half of family medicine clerkships, systemic racism is not addressed, despite interest from students and institutional support. A higher number of hours of faculty training time on the topic of racism was associated with having a systemic racism module in the clerkship curriculum, but we lacked data to identify a causal relationship. Investments in faculty development to teach systemic racism, including discussion of structural competency, are needed.

Indexed as

Clinical ClerkshipFamily PracticeCurriculumFaculty, MedicalHumansSystemic Racism

Identifiers

PMID37043181
PMCPMC10622030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.