Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37043021›Full record

Trial reportEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Audiological outcomes of robot-assisted cochlear implant surgery.

Emilie Heuninck, Paul Van de Heyning, Vincent Van Rompaey, Griet Mertens, Vedat Topsakal

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03746613 nacompletednot on this map

Clinal Evaluation of Navigation Based Functional Ear Surgery Using Image Guided and Robotically Assisted Techniques

TypeinterventionalSponsorProf. Vedat TopsakalRan2018 to 2019Enrolled3ConditionsSensorineural Hearing LossArmsHEARO
NCT04102215 naunknown statusnot on this map

The Efficacy of a Minimally Invasive Direct Cochlear Access Via the HEARO Procedure

TypeinterventionalSponsorProf. Vedat TopsakalRan2019 to 2020Enrolled25ConditionsSensorineural Hearing LossArmsHEARO, OTOPLAN
NCT07081542 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Analysis of Hearing Outcomes: Robotic vs. Manual Insertion of Cochlear Implants

TypeinterventionalSponsorAdventHealthRan2026 to 2027Enrolled32ConditionsSensorineural Hearing Loss, Bilateral Hearing Loss, Cochlear Implantation, Hearing DisordersArmsIotaSoft Robotic Insertion System, Manual Cochlear Implant Insertion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Robot-assisted vs. manual cochlear implant electrode array insertion in four children.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Noise exposure of the inner ear during robotic drilling.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emilie HeuninckDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels Health Campus, Brussels, Belgium. emilie.heuninck@uzbrussel.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4906-3921
Paul Van de HeyningDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Vincent Van RompaeyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Griet MertensDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Vedat TopsakalDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels Health Campus, Brussels, Belgium.
University of Antwerp · BEVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe main objective of this study is to evaluate the short-term and long-term audiological outcomes in patients who underwent cochlear implantation with a robot-assisted system to enable access to the cochlea, and to compare outcomes with a matched control group of patients who underwent cochlear implantation with conventional access to the cochlea.

methodsIn total, 23 patients were implanted by robot-assisted cochlear implant surgery (RACIS). To evaluate the effectiveness of robotic surgery in terms of audiological outcomes, a statistically balanced control group of conventionally implanted patients was created. Minimal outcome measures (MOM), consisting of pure-tone audiometry, speech understanding in quiet and speech understanding in noise were performed pre-operatively and at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 2 years post-activation of the audioprocessor.

resultsThere was no statistically significant difference in pure-tone audiometry, speech perception in quiet and speech perception in noise between robotically implanted and conventionally implanted patients pre-operatively, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 2 years post-activation. A significant improvement in pure-tone hearing thresholds, speech understanding in quiet and speech understanding in noise with the cochlear implant has been quantified as of the first measurements at 3 months and this significant improvement remained stable over a time period of 2 years for HEARO implanted patients.

conclusionClinical outcomes in robot-assisted cochlear implant surgery are comparable to conventional cochlear implantation. CLINICALTRAILS. GOV TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT03746613 (date of registration: 19/11/2018), NCT04102215 (date of registration: 25/09/2019).

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsHearing Loss, SensorineuralRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansCochlear implantationHearing outcomesImage-guided surgeryRobot-assisted cochlear implant surgerySensorineural hearing loss

Identifiers

PMID37043021
OpenAlexW4365136355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.