Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37043006›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

Fluorescence-based sentinel lymph node mapping and lymphography evaluation: results from the IHU-IRCAD-EAES EURO-FIGS registry.

Andrea Picchetto, Lorenzo Cinelli, Elisa Bannone, Gian Luca Baiocchi, Salvador Morales-Conde, Lorenzo Casali, Giuseppe Spinoglio, Christian Franzini, Caterina Santi, Giancarlo D'Ambrosio and 12 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

Andrea Picchetto *Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties "Paride Stefanini", Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy. andrea.picchetto@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4300-9286
Lorenzo Cinelli *Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France.
Elisa BannoneResearch Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France.
Gian Luca BaiocchiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Salvador Morales-CondeUnit of Innovation in Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, University of Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
Lorenzo CasaliOspedale di Vaio, Fidenza, Italy.
Giuseppe SpinoglioCandiolo Cancer Institute IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
Christian FranziniOspedale di Vaio, Fidenza, Italy.
Caterina SantiOspedale di Vaio, Fidenza, Italy.
Giancarlo D'AmbrosioDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties "Paride Stefanini", Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Catalin CopaescuPonderas Academic Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Alessio RolloOspedale di Vaio, Fidenza, Italy.
Andrea BallaUOC of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hospital "San Paolo", Largo Donatori del Sangue 1, 00053, Rome, Civitavecchia, Italy.
Pasquale LepianeUOC of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hospital "San Paolo", Largo Donatori del Sangue 1, 00053, Rome, Civitavecchia, Italy.
Alessandro M PaganiniDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties "Paride Stefanini", Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Paolo DetullioOspedale di Vaio, Fidenza, Italy.
Silvia QuaresimaDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties "Paride Stefanini", Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Antonio PesceGF Ingrassia, Catania, Italy.
Tartamella LucianoOspedale di Vaio, Fidenza, Italy.
Giorgio BianchiOspedale di Vaio, Fidenza, Italy.
Jacques MarescauxResearch Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France.
Michele DianaResearch Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1390-8486
Policlinico Umberto I · ITInstitut de Recherche contre les Cancers de l’Appareil Digestif · FROspedale San Paolo · ITCandiolo Cancer Institute · ITClinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · ROHospital Quirónsalud Sagrado Corazón · ESOspedale G.F. Ingrassia · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of Verona · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe identification of metastatic lymph nodes is one of the most important prognostic factors in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging has been successfully used in GI tumors to detect the lymphatic pathway and the sentinel lymph node (SLN), facilitating fluorescence image-guided surgery (FIGS) with the purpose to achieve a correct nodal staging. The aim of this study was to analyze the current results of NIRF SLN navigation and lymphography through data collected in the EURO-FIGS registry.

methodsProspectively collected data regarding patients and ICG-guided lymphadenectomies were analyzed. Additional analyses were performed to identify predictors of metastatic SLN and determinants of fluorescence positivity and nodal metastases outside the boundaries of standard lymphadenectomies.

resultsOverall, 188 patients were included by 18 surgeons from 10 different centers. Colorectal cancer was the most reported pathology (77.7%), followed by gastric (19.1%) and esophageal tumors (3.2%). ICG was injected with higher doses (p < 0.001) via extraparietal side (63.3%), and with higher volumes (p < 0.001) via endoluminal side (36.7%). Overall, NIRF SLN navigation was positive in 75.5% of all cases and 95.5% of positive SLNs were retrieved, with a metastatic rate of 14.7%. NIRF identification of lymph nodes outside standard lymphatic stations occurred in 52.1% of all cases, 43.8% of which were positive for metastatic involvement. Positive NIRF SLN identification was an independent predictor of metastasis outside standard lymphatic stations (OR = 4.392, p = 0.029), while BMI independently predicted metastasis in retrieved SLNs (OR = 1.187, p = 0.013). Lower doses of ICG were protective against NIRF identification outside standard of care lymphadenectomy (OR = 0.596, p = 0.006), while higher volumes of ICG were predictive of metastatic involvement outside standard of care lymphadenectomy (OR = 1.597, p = 0.001).

conclusionsSLN mapping helps identifying potentially metastatic lymph nodes outside the boundaries of standard lymphadenectomies. The EURO-FIGS registry is a valuable tool to share and analyze European surgeons' practices.

Indexed as

FicusGastrointestinal NeoplasmsLymphadenopathySentinel Lymph NodeSurgery, Computer-AssistedHumansIndocyanine GreenLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesLymphographyRegistriesSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyIndocyanine GreenColorectal cancerEURO-FIGSFluorescence-guided surgeryNear-infrared fluorescence imagingSentinel lymph node mapping

Identifiers

PMID37043006
OpenAlexW4365136375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.