ArticleDie Ophthalmologie2023
[Corneal biomechanics before and after cross-linking in patients with keratoconus].
Article in Die Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of refractive, tomographic and biomechanical changes after customized accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconus patients: a retrospective observational study.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Observational
- Corneal Biomechanical Changes Induced by Chronic Elevated Intraocular Pressure: Implications for Glaucoma Pathogenesis and Management.Journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to analyze the effect of corneal cross-linking (CXL) on corneal biomechanics and visual acuity. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe examination results before and after CXL in 56 eyes of 56 patients between 2017 and 2021 were evaluated retrospectively. The last preoperative examination was compared to the postoperative follow-up values after 6 and 12 months. The main outcome measures included various biomechanical parameters from the Corvis ST (CST), Pentacam and the visual acuity (logMAR, "logarithm of the Minimal Angle of Resolution"). For longitudinal evaluation, a general linear model for repeated measurements was used. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered to show a statistically significant result. Bonferroni correction was applied for multiple comparisons.
resultsThe maximum corneal refractive power K
conclusionIn progressive keratoconus, corneal cross-linking has the potential to positively influence the biomechanics of the cornea and visual acuity as a low complication treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37043004What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.