Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37042982›Full record

SynthesisEuropean radiology2023

Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee for chronological age estimation-a systematic review.

Lil-Sofie Ording Muller, Jan Adolfsson, Lisa Forsberg, Johan Bring, Jovanna Dahlgren, Helena Domeij, Carl Gornitzki, Emma Wernersson, Jenny Odeberg

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Forensic Age Estimation of the Knee with 3D MEDIC MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Lil-Sofie Ording MullerDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Paediatric Radiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway. lilmul@ous-hf.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6529-4984
Jan AdolfssonSwedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lisa ForsbergSwedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan BringStatisticon AB, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jovanna DahlgrenDepartment of Pediatrics, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Helena DomeijSwedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services, Stockholm, Sweden.
Carl GornitzkiSwedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services, Stockholm, Sweden.
Emma WernerssonSwedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jenny OdebergSwedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services, Stockholm, Sweden.
SBU - Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services · SEKarolinska Institutet · SEOslo University Hospital · NOStatisticon (Sweden) · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRadiographs of the hand and teeth are frequently used for medical age assessment, as skeletal and dental maturation correlates with chronological age. These methods have been criticized for their lack of precision, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee has been proposed as a more accurate method. The aim of this systematic review is to explore the scientific and statistical evidence for medical age estimation based on skeletal maturation as assessed by MRI of the knee. MATERIALS AND

methodsA systematic review was conducted that included studies published before April 2021 on living individuals between 8 and 30 years old, with presumptively healthy knees for whom the ossification stages had been evaluated using MRI. The correlation between "mature knee" and chronological age and the risk of misclassifying a child as an adult and vice versa was calculated.

resultsWe found a considerable heterogeneity in the published studies -in terms of study population, MRI protocols, and grading systems used. There is a wide variation in the correlation between maturation stage and chronological age.

conclusionData from published literature is deemed too heterogenous to support the use of MRI of the knee for chronological age determination. Further, it is not possible to assess the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, or positive predictive value for the ability of MRI to determine whether a person is over or under 18 years old. KEY POINTS: • There is an insufficient scientific basis for the use of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee in age determination by skeleton. • It is not possible to assess the predictive value of MRI of the knee to determine whether a person is over or under 18 years of age.

Indexed as

Age Determination by SkeletonKnee JointAdolescentAdultChildHumansKneeMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiographyYoung AdultAge determination by skeletonKnee jointMagnetic resonance imagingPredictive value of testsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37042982
PMCPMC10326106
OpenAlexW4365136326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.