Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37042979›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Fast, light, and scalable: harnessing data-mined line annotations for automated tumor segmentation on brain MRI.

Nathaniel C Swinburne, Vivek Yadav, Krishna Nand Keshava Murthy, Pierre Elnajjar, Hao-Hsin Shih, Prashanth Kumar Panyam, Alice Santilli, David C Gutman, Luke Pike, Nelson S Moss and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Nathaniel C SwinburneDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA. swinburn@mskcc.org.
Vivek YadavDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Krishna Nand Keshava MurthyDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Pierre ElnajjarDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Hao-Hsin ShihDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Prashanth Kumar PanyamDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Alice SantilliDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
David C GutmanDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Luke PikeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Nelson S MossDepartment of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jacqueline StoneDepartment of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Vaios HatzoglouDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Akash ShahDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Krishna JuluruDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Sohrab P ShahComputational Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Andrei I HolodnyDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Robert J YoungDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
M.S.K. MIND Consortium

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWhile fully supervised learning can yield high-performing segmentation models, the effort required to manually segment large training sets limits practical utility. We investigate whether data mined line annotations can facilitate brain MRI tumor segmentation model development without requiring manually segmented training data.

methodsIn this retrospective study, a tumor detection model trained using clinical line annotations mined from PACS was leveraged with unsupervised segmentation to generate pseudo-masks of enhancing tumors on T1-weighted post-contrast images (9911 image slices; 3449 adult patients). Baseline segmentation models were trained and employed within a semi-supervised learning (SSL) framework to refine the pseudo-masks. Following each self-refinement cycle, a new model was trained and tested on a held-out set of 319 manually segmented image slices (93 adult patients), with the SSL cycles continuing until Dice score coefficient (DSC) peaked. DSCs were compared using bootstrap resampling. Utilizing the best-performing models, two inference methods were compared: (1) conventional full-image segmentation, and (2) a hybrid method augmenting full-image segmentation with detection plus image patch segmentation.

resultsBaseline segmentation models achieved DSC of 0.768 (U-Net), 0.831 (Mask R-CNN), and 0.838 (HRNet), improving with self-refinement to 0.798, 0.871, and 0.873 (each p < 0.001), respectively. Hybrid inference outperformed full image segmentation alone: DSC 0.884 (Mask R-CNN) vs. 0.873 (HRNet), p < 0.001.

conclusionsLine annotations mined from PACS can be harnessed within an automated pipeline to produce accurate brain MRI tumor segmentation models without manually segmented training data, providing a mechanism to rapidly establish tumor segmentation capabilities across radiology modalities. KEY POINTS: • A brain MRI tumor detection model trained using clinical line measurement annotations mined from PACS was leveraged to automatically generate tumor segmentation pseudo-masks. • An iterative self-refinement process automatically improved pseudo-mask quality, with the best-performing segmentation pipeline achieving a Dice score of 0.884 on a held-out test set. • Tumor line measurement annotations generated in routine clinical radiology practice can be harnessed to develop high-performing segmentation models without manually segmented training data, providing a mechanism to rapidly establish tumor segmentation capabilities across radiology modalities.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAdultBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesBrainDeep learningMagnetic resonance imagingNeoplasmsRadiology

Identifiers

PMID37042979
PMCPMC10523913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.