Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37042972›Full record

Trial reportInternational urogynecology journal2023

Transurethral injection of autologous muscle precursor cells for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a prospective phase I clinical trial.

Florian A Schmid, Jenny A Prange, Marko Kozomara, Cornelia Betschart, Rosa A Sousa, Nicolas Steinke, Manuela Hunziker, Fabienne Lehner, Markus Veit, Regina Grossmann and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International urogynecology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Femtechs take on women's health.Nature biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Florian A SchmidUniversity Hospital Zurich, Department of Urology, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jenny A PrangeUniversity Hospital Zurich, Department of Urology, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Marko KozomaraUniversity Hospital Zurich, Department of Urology, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Cornelia BetschartUniversity Hospital Zurich, Department of Gynecology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Rosa A SousaUniversity Hospital Zurich, Department of Urology, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nicolas SteinkeUniversity Hospital Zurich, Department of Urology, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Manuela HunzikerUniversity Hospital Zurich, Department of Urology, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Fabienne LehnerUniversity Hospital Zurich, Department of Urology, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Markus VeitUniversity Hospital Zurich, Department of Urology, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Regina GrossmannUniversity Hospital Zurich, Clinical Trial Center, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Anna LandsmannUniversity Hospital Zurich, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andreas M HötkerUniversity Hospital Zurich, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andreas BossUniversity Hospital Zurich, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Deana Mohr-HaralampievaUniversity Hospital Zurich, Department of Urology, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Daniel EberliUniversity Hospital Zurich, Department of Urology, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. daniel.eberli@usz.ch.
University of Zurich · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

H2020 European Institute of Innovation and Technology 731377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe purpose was to investigate the safety and feasibility of transurethral injections of autologous muscle precursor cells (MPCs) into the external urinary sphincter (EUS) to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in female patients.

methodsProspective and randomised phase I clinical trial. Standardised 1-h pad test, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF), urodynamic study, and MRI of the pelvis were performed at baseline and 6 months after treatment. MPCs gained through open muscle biopsy were transported to a GMP facility for processing and cell expansion. The final product was injected into the EUS via a transurethral ultrasound-guided route. Primary outcomes were defined as any adverse events (AEs) during follow-up. Secondary outcomes were functional, questionnaire, and radiological results.

resultsTen female patients with SUI grades I-II were included in the study and 9 received treatment. Out of 8 AEs, 3 (37.5%) were potentially related to treatment and treated conservatively: 1 urinary tract infection healed with antibiotics treatment, 1 dysuria and 1 discomfort at biopsy site. Functional urethral length under stress was 25 mm at baseline compared with 30 mm at 6 months' follow-up (p=0.009). ICIQ-UI-SF scores improved from 7 points at baseline to 4 points at follow-up (p=0.035). MRI of the pelvis revealed no evidence of tumour or necrosis, whereas the diameter of the EUS muscle increased from 1.8 mm at baseline to 1.9 mm at follow-up (p=0.009).

conclusionTransurethral injections of autologous MPCs into the EUS for treatment of SUI in female patients can be regarded as safe and feasible. Only a minimal number of expected and easily treatable AEs were documented.

Indexed as

Urinary IncontinenceUrinary Incontinence, StressFemaleHumansMusclesProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUrethraExternal urinary sphincterMinimally invasiveNeuro-muscular electromagnetic stimulationPrecursor cellsRegenerative therapy

Identifiers

PMID37042972
PMCPMC10506953
OpenAlexW4365135261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.