ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023
bootRanges: flexible generation of null sets of genomic ranges for hypothesis testing.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping cis- and trans-regulatory target genes of human-specific deletions.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Natural selection exerted by historical coronavirus epidemic(s): comparative genetic analysis in China Kadoorie Biobank and UK Biobank.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Article
- The tidyomics ecosystem: enhancing omic data analyses.Nature methods · 2024Article
- ThebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Disentangling sex-dependent effects of APOE on diverse trajectories of cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease.NeuroImage · 2024Article
- Article
- The SWI/SNF nucleosome remodeler constrains enhancer activity during Drosophila wing development.Genetics · 2024Article
- Conumee 2.0: enhanced copy-number variation analysis from DNA methylation arrays for humans and mice.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Ultra-long-range interactions between active regulatory elements.Genome research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationEnrichment analysis is a widely utilized technique in genomic analysis that aims to determine if there is a statistically significant association between two sets of genomic features. To conduct this type of hypothesis testing, an appropriate null model is typically required. However, the null distribution that is commonly used can be overly simplistic and may result in inaccurate conclusions.
resultsbootRanges provides fast functions for generation of block bootstrapped genomic ranges representing the null hypothesis in enrichment analysis. As part of a modular workflow, bootRanges offers greater flexibility for computing various test statistics leveraging other Bioconductor packages. We show that shuffling or permutation schemes may result in overly narrow test statistic null distributions and over-estimation of statistical significance, while creating new range sets with a block bootstrap preserves local genomic correlation structure and generates more reliable null distributions. It can also be used in more complex analyses, such as accessing correlations between cis-regulatory elements (CREs) and genes across cell types or providing optimized thresholds, e.g. log fold change (logFC) from differential analysis. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: bootRanges is freely available in the R/Bioconductor package nullranges hosted at https://bioconductor.org/packages/nullranges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.