ArticleJournal of experimental botany2023
Studying root-environment interactions in structured microdevices.
Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering rhizobacterial communities for soil and plant health.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2026Review
- Synthetic microbiomes in bioengineered rhizospheres: new frontiers for climate-resilient agriculture.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Nanofabrication Techniques for Enhancing Plant-Microbe Interactions in Sustainable Agriculture.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Disentangling the feedback loops driving spatial patterning in microbial communities.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Review
- RoPod, a customizable toolkit for non-invasive root imaging, reveals cell type-specific dynamics of plant autophagy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A quantitative model for spatio-temporal dynamics of root gravitropism.Journal of experimental botany · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When interacting with the environment, plant roots integrate sensory information over space and time in order to respond appropriately under non-uniform conditions. The complexity and dynamic properties of soil across spatial and temporal scales pose a significant technical challenge for research into the mechanisms that drive metabolism, growth, and development in roots, as well as on inter-organismal networks in the rhizosphere. Synthetic environments, combining microscopic access and manipulation capabilities with soil-like heterogeneity, are needed to elucidate the intriguing antagonism that characterizes subsurface ecosystems. Microdevices have provided opportunities for innovative approaches to observe, analyse, and manipulate plant roots and advanced our understanding of their development, physiology, and interactions with the environment. Initially conceived as perfusion platforms for root cultivation under hydroponic conditions, microdevice design has, in recent years, increasingly shifted to better reflect the complex growth conditions in soil. Heterogeneous micro-environments have been created through co-cultivation with microbes, laminar flow-based local stimulation, and physical obstacles and constraints. As such, structured microdevices provide an experimental entry point into the complex network behaviour of soil communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.