ArticleAnatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)2025
Variation and development of the turtle chondrocranium, with a description of the common musk turtle (Sternotherus odoratus, Kinosternidae, Cryptodira, Testudines).
Article in Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structure and evolution of the embryonic cartilaginous skull of crocodilians.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Variation and development of the turtle chondrocranium, with a description of the common musk turtle (Sternotherus odoratus, Kinosternidae, Cryptodira, Testudines).Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Based on histological cross-sections, the chondrocranium of the common musk turtle (Sternotherus odoratus) was reconstructed, described, and compared with other turtles. It differs from that of other turtle chondrocrania by possessing elongated, slightly dorsally orientated nasal capsules with three dorsolateral foramina, which might be homologous to the foramen epiphaniale, and by having an enlarged crista parotica. Additionally, the posterior part of the palatoquadrate is more elongated and more slender than in other turtles, while its ascending process is connected to the otic capsule by appositional bone. The proportions of the chondrocranium were also compared with those of "mature" chondrocrania of other turtle species in a Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Other than expected, the S. odoratus chondrocranium is not similar in proportions to those of chelydrids, the closest related species in the sample. The results indicate to differences in the proportions among larger turtle clades (e.g., Durocryptodira, Pleurodira, and Trionychia). S. odoratus is an exception to this pattern since it shows elongated nasal capsules similar to the trionychid Pelodiscus sinensis. A second PCA comparing the chondrocranial proportions of multiple developmental "stages" mostly shows differences between trionychids and all other turtles. S. odoratus is again similar to trionychids along PC1, but its proportions are the most similar along PC2 and PC3 to older "stages" of americhelydians, including the chelydrid Chelydra serpentina, which is related to chondrocranium height and quadrate width. We discuss potential ecological correlations of our findings mirrored in late embryonic stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.