Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37042307›Full record

ReviewCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2023

Monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma: A literature review.

Amirhossein Tamimi, Atena Tamimi, Fatemeh Sorkheh, Saba Mardekatani Asl, Arezoo Ghafari, Arian Ghannadi Karimi, Gisou Erabi, Hossein Pourmontaseri, Niloofar Deravi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Multi-modality imaging for precise intra-arterial delivery of mRNA, AAVs, and antibodies to the head and neck area in mice.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Amirhossein TamimiStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Atena TamimiStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh SorkhehStudent Research Committee, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-8130-6471
Saba Mardekatani AslStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Arezoo GhafariStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Arian Ghannadi KarimiStudent Research Committee, Qazvin University of Medical Science, Qazvin, Iran.
Gisou ErabiStudent Research Committee, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.
Hossein PourmontaseriStudent Research Committee, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9629-2284
Niloofar DeraviStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRGuilan University of Medical Sciences · IRBabol University of Medical Sciences · IRFasa University of Medical Sciences · IRQazvin University of Medical Sciences · IRUrmia University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSquamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a relatively common and heterogenous malignancy of different organs, such as the skin, esophagus, and lungs. Although most cases experience good survival with surgical methods, management of advanced types of the disease remains challenging. Several modalities, including different chemotherapy regimens and immunotherapies, have been investigated in this matter, among which Monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) are one of the most promising ones. Since the development of Mabs, they have been widely used to treat different diseases. Mabs have shown significant efficacy with high specificity along with acceptable safety, which makes them a favorable option in cancer therapy. In this article, we aimed to review the different aspects of using Mabs in SCC therapy. RECENT

findingsWe found that treating with different Mabs has shown excellent efficacy accompanied by acceptable safety in treating SCC of different organs. Therefore, Mabs are considered great options in the treatment of SCC, especially in advanced cases. Overall, two highly potent types of Mabs in SCC therapy are anti-EGFR Mabs and checkpoint inhibitors, especially Cetuximab, Nimotuzumab, and PD-1 inhibitors. Bevacizumab is also a promising option as adjuvant therapy to other modalities.

conclusionAlthough some Mabs have shown promising outcomes in SCC therapy, their application as a part of cancer treatment depends on further investigations regarding cost-effectiveness and predictors of response. FDA has approved several Mabs in SCC therapies, and Mabs may have a crucial role in this era in the near future, especially in treating head and neck and esophageal SCC and metastatic lung cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Squamous CellAntibodies, MonoclonalCetuximabErbB ReceptorsHumansAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsCetuximabErbB Receptorsanti-cancerimmunotherapymonoclonal antibodysquamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID37042307
PMCPMC10172176
OpenAlexW4365136118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.