Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37042037›Full record

ArticleCancer2023

Dose-escalation trial of combination dabrafenib, trametinib, and AT13387 in patients with BRAF-mutant solid tumors.

Meghan J Mooradian, James M Cleary, Anita Giobbie-Hurder, Lancia N F Darville, Aparna Parikh, Elizabeth I Buchbinder, Justine V Cohen, Donald P Lawrence, Geoffrey I Shapiro, Harold Keer and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02097225 (Phase I Study of AT13387 in Combination With Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Patients With BRAF-Mutant Melanoma and Other Solid Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02097225 phase1terminatednot on this map

Phase I Study of AT13387 in Combination With Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Patients With BRAF-Mutant Melanoma and Other Solid Tumors

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2014 to 2022Enrolled22ConditionsBRAF V600E Mutation Present, BRAF V600K Mutation Present, Metastatic Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Metastatic MelanomaArmsDabrafenib, Laboratory Biomarker Analysis, Onalespib, Pharmacological Study, Trametinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. What, if Any, Role Is There for BRAF-Targeted Therapy inJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Article
  4. Molecular Pathways and Mechanisms of BRAF in Cancer Therapy.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Meghan J MooradianDivision of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8289-8015
James M ClearyHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Anita Giobbie-HurderDivision of Biostatistics, Departments of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lancia N F DarvilleDepartment of Proteomics and Metabolomics Core, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Aparna ParikhDivision of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5245-7841
Elizabeth I BuchbinderHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7979-8953
Justine V CohenDivision of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4803-9230
Donald P LawrenceDivision of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Geoffrey I ShapiroHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Harold KeerAstex Pharmaceuticals Inc., Pleasanton, California, USA.
Helen X ChenCancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Susan Percy IvyCancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7747-072X
Keiran S M SmalleyDepartment of Tumor Biology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
John M KoomenDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Ryan J SullivanDivision of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5344-6645
Harvard University · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USNational Cancer Institute · MYDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USPlex Pharmaceuticals (United States) · US

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KENNETH Lynn WRIGHT · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
XPO1 inhibitors Selinexor and Eltanexor in Combination with Venetoclax and Decitabine (ASTX727) in AMLUM1CA186709 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI KEITH T FLAHERTY, DONALD W. KUFE · 2014 to 2026
$25.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCombination BRAF and MEK inhibitor therapy is an active regimen in patients who have BRAF V600E-mutated tumors; however, the clinical efficacy of this therapy is limited by resistance. Preclinically, the addition of heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibition improves the efficacy of BRAF inhibitor therapy in both BRAF inhibitor-sensitive and BRAF inhibitor-resistant mutant cell lines.

methodsCancer Therapy Evaluation Program study 9557 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02097225) is a phase 1 study that was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of the small-molecule HSP90 inhibitor, AT13387, in combination with dabrafenib and trametinib in BRAF V600E/K-mutant solid tumors. Correlative analyses evaluated the expression of HSP90 client proteins and chaperones.

resultsTwenty-two patients with metastatic, BRAF V600E-mutant solid tumors were enrolled using a 3 + 3 design at four dose levels, and 21 patients were evaluable for efficacy assessment. The most common tumor type was colorectal cancer (N = 12). Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in one patient at dose level 3 and in one patient at dose level 4; specifically, myelosuppression and fatigue, respectively. The maximum tolerated dose was oral dabafenib 150 mg twice daily, oral trametinib 2 mg once daily, and intravenous AT13387 260 mg/m

conclusionsHSP90 inhibition combined with BRAF/MEK inhibition was safe and produced evidence of modest disease control in a heavily pretreated population. Additional translational work may identify tumor types and resistance mechanisms that are most sensitive to this approach.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsMelanomaAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBenzamidesHumansImidazolesIsoindolesMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesMutationOximesProtein Kinase InhibitorsProteomicsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafPyridonesPyrimidinones(2,4-dihydroxy-5-isopropylphenyl)-(5-(4-methylpiperazin-1-ylmethyl)-1,3-dihydroisoindol-2-yl)methanoneBenzamidesBRAF protein, humandabrafenibImidazolesIsoindolesMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesOximesProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafPyridonesPyrimidinonestrametinibBRAF inhibitorBRAF-mutantheat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitionMEK inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID37042037
PMCPMC10793106
OpenAlexW4365135327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.