Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37041991›Full record

Articlenpj urban sustainability2023

Contributions of the voluntary local review process to policy integration: evidence from frontrunner cities.

Fernando Ortiz-Moya, Marco Reggiani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in npj urban sustainability, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fernando Ortiz-MoyaCity Taskforce, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies. 2108-11, Kamiyamaguchi, Hayama Kanagawa, 240-0115 Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1390-2519
Marco ReggianiUniversity of Strathclyde, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, James Weir Building, Level 5, 75 Montrose Street, Glasgow, G1 1XJ Scotland UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6158-2302

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) relies on effective policy integration at all levels of government. However, integration across policy domains remains challenging for local authorities, particularly when it comes to articulating policies that recognise trade-offs and interactions between different SDGs. This study explores how the Voluntary Local Review (VLR) process-a tool to localise the 2030 Agenda-contributes to policy integration by thematically analysing interviews with city officials in 12 frontrunner cities that conducted a VLR between 2019 and 2020. Our results suggest three main ways in which the VLR process affects policy integration: (1) by facilitating cooperation and interdependencies between different policy sectors; (2) by creating new instruments to mainstream SDGs; and (3) by enhancing sustainability competencies. Hence, our study suggests that conducting a VLR has the transformative potential to achieve greater policy integration and further the 2030 Agenda.

Indexed as

Development studiesSocial policy

Identifiers

PMID37041991
PMCPMC10078030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.