Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37041987›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2023

Outcome prediction model and prognostic biomarkers for COVID-19 patients in Vietnam.

Hien Thi Thu Nguyen, Vang Le-Quy, Son Van Ho, Jakob Holm Dalsgaard Thomsen, Malene Pontoppidan Stoico, Hoang Van Tong, Nhat-Linh Nguyen, Henrik Bygum Krarup, Son Hong Nguyen, Viet Quoc Tran and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Hien Thi Thu NguyenDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4175-0927
Vang Le-QuyAVSE Global Medical Translational Research Network, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2035-8619
Son Van HoMilitary Hospital 175, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Jakob Holm Dalsgaard ThomsenDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Malene Pontoppidan StoicoDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Hoang Van TongDepartment of Pathophysiology, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7170-8810
Nhat-Linh NguyenAVSE Global Medical Translational Research Network, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4820-6967
Henrik Bygum KrarupDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5294-2428
Son Hong NguyenMilitary Hospital 175, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Viet Quoc TranMilitary Hospital 175, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Linh Toan NguyenDepartment of Pathophysiology, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7850-3896
Anh Tuan Dinh-XuanAVSE Global Medical Translational Research Network, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8651-5176
Aalborg University Hospital · DKVietnam Military Medical University · VNHôpital Cochin · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate prognosis is important either after acute infection or during long-term follow-up of patients infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. This study aims to predict coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity based on clinical and biological indicators, and to identify biomarkers for prognostic assessment. Methods: We included 261 Vietnamese COVID-19 patients, who were classified into moderate and severe groups. Disease severity prediction based on biomarkers and clinical parameters was performed by applying machine learning and statistical methods using the combination of clinical and biological data. Results: The random forest model could predict with 97% accuracy the likelihood of COVID-19 patients who subsequently worsened to the severe condition. The most important indicators were interleukin (IL)-6, ferritin and D-dimer. The model could still predict with 92% accuracy after removing IL-6 from the analysis to generalise the applicability of the model to hospitals with limited capacity for IL-6 testing. The five most effective indicators were C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, IL-6, ferritin and dyspnoea. Two different sets of biomarkers (D-dimer, IL-6 and ferritin, and CRP, D-dimer and IL-6) are applicable for the assessment of disease severity and prognosis. The two biomarker sets were further tested through machine learning algorithms and relatively validated on two Danish COVID-19 patient groups (n=32 and n=100). The results indicated that various biomarker sets combined with clinical data can be used for detection of the potential to develop the severe condition. Conclusion: This study provided a simple and reliable model using two different sets of biomarkers to assess disease severity and predict clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients in Vietnam.

Identifiers

PMID37041987
PMCPMC9885243
OpenAlexW4318070513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.