ReviewJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2023
Patient Specific Alloplastic Implant Reconstruction of Mandibular Defects-Safe Practice Recommendations and Guidelines.
Review in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison between patient-specific implants and hand-bent plates in mandibular reconstruction.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- A Prospective, International, Multicentre Registry of Patients Undergoing Segmental Mandibular Defect Reconstruction After Mandibular Resection for Tumours and Drug-Induced Osteonecrosis: A Study Protocol.Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes and mechanical evaluation of patient-specific mandibular reconstruction following tumor resection: a retrospective study with finite element analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Restoring Mandibular Anatomy After Complex Trauma: Clinical Applications of a Statistical Shape Model.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Fully Automated AI-Based Digital Workflow for Mirroring of Healthy and Defective Craniofacial Models.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Patient-specific implants for intraoral and maxillofacial reconstruction: a scoping review on customization and fabrication methods.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mandibular continuity defects are commonly seen after tumor resection, osteomyelitis or maxillofacial trauma. Three-dimensional reconstruction of these mandibular segmental defects is critical for proper mandibular functioning and esthetics. Various methods used to reconstruct such defects include bridging reconstruction plates, modular endoprosthesis, non-vascularized and vascularized bone grafting with stock reconstruction plate or patient specific implants (PSI) and tissue engineering bone transfer. But in the recent years, literature documents use of PSI only alloplastic reconstruction as an alternate to microvascular bone flap reconstruction. Representative cases enumerate current practice of 'patient specific implant only' mandibular reconstruction and its pitfalls. This article discusses current status of literature on PSI's, choice of indications for 'PSI only' mandibular reconstruction and also proposes guidelines for safe practice of patient specific implant reconstruction of mandible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.