ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2023
A Comparative Volumetric Assessment of Cancellous and Cortico-Cancellous Bone Graft in the Management of Unilateral Alveolar Cleft Defect using Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Scan-A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Graft materials and regenerative strategies in secondary alveolar bone grafting: A scoping review of randomized clinical trials.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The most commonly preferred procedure for surgical correction of alveolar bone defect and restoration of bony contour is anterior iliac crest graft. Since the ancient time, cancellous bone graft is considered as a gold standard, but it has a high resorption rate and many other disadvantages, and hence we conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy of Cortico-cancellous bone graft harvested from anterior iliac crest to find out whether it can be used as a substitute for cancellous bone graft or not. Aims & Objectives: The objectives of present study were to compare and evaluate the bone bridge formation rate, resorption rate, and uptake of bone graft at recipient site using cancellous and corticocanellous bone graft harvested from anterior iliac crest for complete unilateral cleft alveolus defects. Patients and Method: Total 20 patients were divided into two groups by lottery method of randomization. Each group comprises of total 10 patients treated with cancellous bone graft in group 1 and corticocancellous bone graft in group 2 patients harvested from anterior iliac crest. Preoperatively and postoperatively CBCT scans were taken for each patient to calculate the volume of cleft defect and volume of newly formed bone after 6 months, respectively. Grafting fill rate was calculated and mean graft filling rate observed in the patients of group 1 was 1.14 ± 0.03, and in patients of group 2, it was 1.17 ± 0.03. The mean bone bridge formation rate observed in the patients of group 1 was 91.85 ± 0.81 and in patients of group 2 it was 87.89 ± 0.75. The mean bone resorption rate obtained in the patients of group 1 was 18.74 ± 0.42 and in patients of group 2 it was 16.87 ± 0.52. Conclusion: The present study concluded that accurate estimation of the amount required for bone grafting in the alveolar cleft can be performed by CBCT scan data using Planmeca Romexis viewer version 5.0 software. Even though the corticocancellous bone graft has some drawbacks, it is equally good as cancellous bone graft because of its less resorption than cancellous bone graft and can be considered as a second best option for secondary alveolar bone grafting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.