Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37041934›Full record

ArticleSocial network analysis and mining2023

Social network analysis of Twitter interactions: a directed multilayer network approach.

Austin P Logan, Phillip M LaCasse, Brian J Lunday

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social network analysis and mining, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Austin P LoganDirectorate of Plans, Programs, and Requirements, Air Combat Command, 129 Andrews Street, Langley Air Force Base, VA 23665 USA.
Phillip M LaCasse *Department of Operational Sciences, Air Force Institute of Technology, 2950 Hobson Way, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433 USA.
Brian J Lunday *Department of Operational Sciences, Air Force Institute of Technology, 2950 Hobson Way, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective employment of social media for any social influence outcome requires a detailed understanding of the target audience. Social media provides a rich repository of self-reported information that provides insight regarding the sentiments and implied priorities of an online population. Using Social Network Analysis, this research models user interactions on Twitter as a weighted, directed network. Topic modeling through Latent Dirichlet Allocation identifies the topics of discussion in Tweets, which this study uses to induce a directed multilayer network wherein users (in one layer) are connected to the conversations and topics (in a second layer) in which they have participated, with inter-layer connections representing user participation in conversations. Analysis of the resulting network identifies both influential users and highly connected groups of individuals, informing an understanding of group dynamics and individual connectivity. The results demonstrate that the generation of a topically-focused social network to represent conversations yields more robust findings regarding influential users, particularly when analysts collect Tweets from a variety of discussions through more general search queries. Within the analysis, PageRank performed best among four measures used to rank individual influence within this problem context. In contrast, the results of applying both the Greedy Modular Algorithm and the Leiden Algorithm to identify communities were mixed; each method yielded valuable insights, but neither technique was uniformly superior. The demonstrated four-step process is readily replicable, and an interested user can automate the process with relatively low effort or expense.

Indexed as

Multilayer networksNatural language processingNetworksSocial network analysis

Identifiers

PMID37041934
PMCPMC10081299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.