ArticleACS sustainable chemistry & engineering2023
Recycling of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Kits.
Article in ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multifunctional lignin-based nanocomposites and nanohybrids.Green chemistry : an international journal and green chemistry resource : GC · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) kits have been used as common diagnosing tools during the outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, with daily worldwide usage in the millions. It is well known that at the beginning of the pandemic, there was a shortage of PCR kits. So far, the ecosystem of a PCR kit is linear use; that is, kits are produced, used once, and disposed of as biolab waste. Here, we show that to mitigate the risk of future shortages, it is possible to envision recyclable PCR kits based on a more sustainable use of nucleic acid resources. A PCR kit is mainly composed of primers, nucleotides, and enzymes. In the case of a positive test, the free nucleotides are polymerized onto the primers to form longer DNA strands. Our approach depolymerizes such strands, keeping the primers and regenerating the nucleotides, i.e., returning the nucleic acid materials to the original state. The polymerized long DNA strands are hydrolyzed into nucleotide monophosphates that are then phosphorylated into triphosphates using a method that is developed from a recent publication. We used oligonucleotides with a 3'-terminal phosphorothioate (PS) backbone modification as nonhydrolyzable PCR primers, which are able to undergo the recycling process unchanged. The nuclease resistance of oligonucleotides with a ribose sugar modification was also evaluated, which showed worse recycling efficiency than PS-modified oligonucleotides. We successfully recycled both PCR primers and nucleotide monomers (∼75% yield). We demonstrate that the method allows for the direct reuse of PCR kits. We also show that the recycled primers can be isolated and then added to endpoint or quantitative PCR. This recycling approach provides a new path for circularly reusing nucleic acid materials in PCR kits.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.