Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37041887›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2023

Psychometric Evaluation of the Grit Psychological Resources Scale (GPRS).

Sarah E Schimschal, Michelle Cleary, Rachel A Kornhaber, Tony Barnett, Denis C Visentin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah E SchimschalCentre for Rural Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7188-5553
Michelle ClearySchool of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Sciences, CQUniversity, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1453-4850
Rachel A KornhaberSchool of Nursing, University of Tasmania, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6556-6775
Tony BarnettCentre for Rural Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia.
Denis C VisentinSchool of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9961-4384

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Psychological resources have been shown to play a prominent role in buffering against stress and are associated with various positive constructs, including grit, defined as having the disposition to pursue long-term goals with both passion and perseverance. Objective: The objective of this study was to validate a new scale developed to measure the psychological resources of grit. Methods: A quantitative research study was conducted online with an international sample of 277 adults from a range of professional backgrounds. The psychometric properties of the 20-item Grit Psychological Resources Scale (GPRS) were evaluated by performing tests of reliability and validity. Results: Reliability tests provided evidence of high internal consistency (α = 0.91) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.75). Demographic variables did not significantly predict scores or influence survey completion. Face, content and convergent validity provided additional psychometric support for the GPRS with this sample. Confirmatory factor analysis results supported a second-order model with four sub-scales. The first-order factors loaded highly onto the second-order factor, with correlations ranging from 0.80 to 0.97. Conclusion: The GPRS showed satisfactory psychometric properties, indicating that the scale is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring the psychological resources of grit. This scale can be used to identify more targeted developmental approaches for personal and professional growth. Further, the tool enables information to be gathered on changes pre- and post-improvement initiatives to assess their effectiveness in training and continuing education.

Indexed as

factor analysisgritpsychological resourcespsychometricsreliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID37041887
PMCPMC10083025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.