ArticleSpine surgery and related research2023
Analysis of Dynamic Factors and Spinal Sagittal Alignment in Patients with Thoracic Spondylotic Myelopathy.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Although thoracic spondylotic myelopathy (TSM) without ossification or disc disorder has been associated with some dynamic factors in the thoracolumbar area, a detailed investigation is yet to be published. Thus, in this study, we investigated the segmental motion and sagittal alignment of the thoracolumbar area in patients with and without TSM. Methods: Patients with TSM who were treated from 2013 to 2020 were enrolled in this study. The non-TSM group consisted of sex- and age-matched patients with spinal disorders other than TSM. Segmental mobility from T10-L2 during passive maximum flexion and extension following myelography and the sagittal cobb angles of T10-L1 and L1-L5 in the standing position were measured using multidetector computed tomography (CT). The mobility of each segment was set as the difference in the angles between the two positions. Results: In total, 10 patients (8 males and 2 females, mean age 65.8 years) with TSM and 20 without TSM were enrolled. The most stenotic level was observed at T10-T11 in four cases and T11-T12 in six. The average mobility at this segment in the TSM group (5.8°) was significantly greater than that in the non-TSM group (2.1°) (p<0.001). In the TSM group, the cobb angles of T10-L1 and L1-L5 were 2.3° and 17.4° of lordosis, respectively, which differed significantly from those in the non-TSM group, which were 8° of kyphosis and 32.2° of lordosis, respectively (p<0.001 and p=0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Compared with those without TSM, patients with TSM were found to have greater segmental mobility at the most stenotic level, thoracolumbar lordosis, and decreased lumbar lordosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.