ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2023
Clinical Evaluation of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Combined with Peritoneal Lavage for Severe Acute Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the efficacy and safety of nafamostat mesylate and heparin in blood purification therapy for patients with severe acute pancreatitis: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Targeting PFKFB3 to restore glucose metabolism in acute pancreatitis via nanovesicle delivery.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Procalcitonin as a Predictor of Mortality in Patients With Severe Acute Pancreatitis.Gastroenterology research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in combination with peritoneal lavage for the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed data from 52 patients with severe acute pancreatitis between January 2014 and December 2021 at Jiangyin People's Hospital. The patients were divided into 2 groups: CRRT (n=26) and CRRT in combination with peritoneal lavage (n=26). The following results and outcomes were retrospectively compared: procalcitonin, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein levels, duration of systemic inflammatory response, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores, abdominal distention relief time, abdominal pain relief time, length of intensive care unit stay, length of hospital stay, inpatient hospital costs, incidence of complications, and mortality. RESULTS There were significant differences in interleukin-6 and procalcitonin levels and APACHE-II scores after 3 and 7 days of treatment. The duration of systemic inflammatory response, abdominal distention relief time, abdominal pain relief time, length of intensive care unit stay, and length of hospital stay were considerably shorter in the combination group than in the CRRT group (P<0.01). Inpatient hospital costs were significantly lower in the combination group than in the CRRT group (P<0.01). However, incidence of complications and mortality showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS CRRT combined with peritoneal lavage is an important adjuvant therapy in the early stages of acute severe acute pancreatitis and has better clinical efficacy than CRRT alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.