Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37041657›Full record

ArticleThe Medical journal of Australia2023

The diagnosis and initial management of melanoma in Australia: findings from the prospective, population-based QSkin study.

Nirmala Pandeya, Catherine M Olsen, Maja M Shalit, Jean Claude Dusingize, Rachel E Neale, David C Whiteman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Medical journal of Australia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Clinical Perspective on Melanoma Overdiagnosis.The Australasian journal of dermatology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nirmala PandeyaQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD.
Catherine M OlsenQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD.ORCID 0000-0003-4483-1888
Maja M ShalitQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD.
Jean Claude DusingizeQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD.
Rachel E NealeQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD.
David C WhitemanQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD.
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1073898; APP1063061; APP1185416; APP1155413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the proportions of newly diagnosed melanomas treated by different medical specialist types, to describe the types of excisions performed, and to investigate factors associated with treating practitioner specialty and excision type. DESIGN,

settingProspective cohort study; analysis of linked data: baseline surveys, hospital, pathology, Queensland Cancer Register, and Medical Benefits Schedule databases.

participantsRandom sample of 43 764 Queensland residents aged 40-69 years recruited during 2011, with initial diagnoses of in situ or invasive melanoma diagnosed to 31 December 2019.

main outcome measuresTreating practitioner type and treatment modality for first incident melanoma; second and subsequent treatment events for the primary melanoma.

resultsDuring a median follow-up of 8.4 years (interquartile range, 8.3-8.8 years), 1683 eligible participants (720 women, 963 men) developed at least one primary melanoma (in situ melanoma, 1125; invasive melanoma, 558), 1296 of which (77.1%) were initially managed in primary care; 248 were diagnosed by dermatologists (14.8%), 83 by plastic surgeons (4.9%), 43 by general surgeons (2.6%), and ten by other specialists (0.6%). The most frequent initial procedures leading to histologically confirmed melanoma diagnosis were first excision (854, 50.7%), shave biopsy (549, 32.6%), and punch biopsy (178, 10.6%); 1339 melanomas (79.6%) required two procedures, 187 (11.1%) three. Larger proportions of melanomas diagnosed by dermatologists (87%) or plastic surgeons (71%) were in people living in urban areas than of those diagnosed in primary care (63%); larger proportions of melanomas diagnosed by dermatologists or plastic surgeons than of those diagnosed in primary care were in people with university degrees (45%, 42% v 23%) or upper quartile clinical risk scores (63%, 59% v 47%).

conclusionsMost incident melanomas in Queensland are diagnosed in primary care, and nearly half are initially managed by partial excision (shave or punch biopsy). Second or third, wider excisions are undertaken in about 90% of cases.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAustraliaCutaneous Malignant MelanomaFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesDiagnostic tests and proceduresGeneral practiceMelanoma

Identifiers

PMID37041657
PMCPMC10953446
OpenAlexW4365136035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.