Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37041639›Full record

ReviewThrombosis journal2023

Antibiotic use in acute mesenteric ischemia: a review of the evidence and call to action.

Yuqian Tian, Sanjeev Dhara, Christopher D Barrett, Aaron P Richman, Tejal S Brahmbhatt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Thrombosis journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Managing acute mesenteric ischaemia.Intensive care medicine · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuqian Tian *Division of Acute Care Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Sanjeev Dhara *Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Christopher D BarrettDivision of Acute Care Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Aaron P RichmanDivisions of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Boston University Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Tejal S BrahmbhattDivisions of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Boston University Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. Tejal.Brahmbhatt@bmc.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a life-threatening condition with a high mortality rate. The standard practice after making the diagnosis includes aggressive resuscitation, anticoagulation, followed by revascularization and resection of necrotic bowel. The role of empiric antibiotics in the management of AMI is not well defined in the literature. This review article aims to examine our current understanding on this matter, based on bench research and clinical studies. It is demonstrated in animal study model that the ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury damages intestinal epithelium, and subsequently lead to barrier dysfunction, a condition that can support bacterial translocation through a complex interplay between the intestinal epithelium, the intestinal immune system and the intestine's endogenous bacterial population. Based on this mechanism, it is possible that the use of antibiotics may help mitigate the consequences of I/R injury, which is examined in few animal studies. In clinical practice, many guidelines support the use of prophylactic antibiotics, based on a meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCTs) demonstrating the benefit of antibiotics in multi-organ dysfunction syndrome. However, there is no direct reference to AMI in this meta-analysis. Most clinical studies that focus on AMI and mentions the use of antibiotics are retrospective and single institution, and very few comments on the role of antibiotics in their discussions. We conclude that there is limited evidence in literature to support the use of prophylactic antibiotic in AMI to improve outcome. More clinical studies with high level of evidence and basic science research are needed to improve our understanding on this topic and ultimately help build a better clinical pathway for patients with AMI.

Indexed as

AntibioticsEpithelial barrierMesenteric ischemiaSepsisThromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID37041639
PMCPMC10088293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.