Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37041631›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

SupportPrim-a computerized clinical decision support system for stratified care for patients with musculoskeletal pain complaints in general practice: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Lars Christian Naterstad Lervik, Ottar Vasseljen, Bjarne Austad, Kerstin Bach, Anita Formo Bones, Fredrik Granviken, Jonathan C Hill, Pål Jørgensen, Torbjørn Øien, Paola Marin Veites and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Models of care for managing non-specific low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lars Christian Naterstad LervikGeneral Practice Research Unit, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway. lars.c.lervik@ntnu.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8157-1005
Ottar VasseljenDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Bjarne AustadGeneral Practice Research Unit, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Kerstin BachDepartment of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Anita Formo BonesDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Fredrik GranvikenDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Jonathan C HillSchool of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK.
Pål JørgensenDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Torbjørn ØienGeneral Practice Research Unit, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Paola Marin VeitesDepartment of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Danielle A Van der WindtSchool of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK.
Ingebrigt MeisingsetDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd ref 303331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMusculoskeletal disorders represented 149 million years lived with disability world-wide in 2019 and are the main cause of years lived with disability worldwide. Current treatment recommendations are based on "one-size fits all" principle, which does not take into account the large degree of biopsychosocial heterogeneity in this group of patients. To compensate for this, we developed a stratified care computerized clinical decision support system for general practice based on patient biopsychosocial phenotypes; furthermore, we added personalized treatment recommendations based on specific patient factors to the system. In this study protocol, we describe the randomized controlled trial for evaluating the effectiveness of computerized clinical decision support system for stratified care for patients with common musculoskeletal pain complaints in general practice. The aim of this study is to test the effect of a computerized clinical decision support system for stratified care in general practice on subjective patient outcome variables compared to current care.

methodsWe will perform a cluster-randomized controlled trial with 44 general practitioners including 748 patients seeking their general practitioner due to pain in the neck, back, shoulder, hip, knee, or multisite. The intervention group will use the computerized clinical decision support system, while the control group will provide current care for their patients. The primary outcomes assessed at 3 months are global perceived effect and clinically important improvement in function measured by the Patient-Specific Function Scale (PSFS), while secondary outcomes include change in pain intensity measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D), general musculoskeletal health (MSK-HQ), number of treatments, use of painkillers, sick-leave grading and duration, referral to secondary care, and use of imaging. DISCUSSION: The use of biopsychosocial profile to stratify patients and implement it in a computerized clinical decision support system for general practitioners is a novel method of providing decision support for this patient group. The study aim to recruit patients from May 2022 to March 2023, and the first results from the study will be available late 2023.

trial registrationThe trial is registered in ISRCTN 11th of May 2022: 14,067,965.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersMusculoskeletal PainHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBiopsychosocial modelClinical decision-makingComputerized clinical decision support systemsElectronic health recordsGeneral practiceInformation technologyMusculoskeletal disordersMusculoskeletal painOnline systems

Identifiers

PMID37041631
PMCPMC10088189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.