Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37041605›Full record

ReviewOrphanet journal of rare diseases2023

Decentralized clinical trials and rare diseases: a Drug Information Association Innovative Design Scientific Working Group (DIA-IDSWG) perspective.

Mercedeh Ghadessi, Junrui Di, Chenkun Wang, Kiichiro Toyoizumi, Nan Shao, Chaoqun Mei, Charmaine Demanuele, Rui Sammi Tang, Gianna McMillan, Robert A Beckman

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
28.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. The Current Landscape of Clinical Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Mercedeh GhadessiResearch and Early Development Statistics, Bayer U.S. LLC, 100 Bayer Boulevard, Pharmaceuticals, Whippany, NJ, 07981, USA.
Junrui DiGlobal Product Development, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA. junrui.Di@pfizer.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6325-8090
Chenkun WangBiostatistics department, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc, 50 Northern Avenue, Boston, MA, 02210, USA.
Kiichiro ToyoizumiStatistics & Decision Sciences Department, Janssen Pharmaceutical K. K, 5-2, Nishi-kanda 3- chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 101-0065, Japan.
Nan ShaoBiostatistics, Moderna, Inc, 200 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Chaoqun MeiGlobal Biometrics and Data Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Berkeley Heights, NJ, 07922, USA.
Charmaine DemanueleGlobal Product Development, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Rui Sammi TangClinical Development, Global Biometric Department, Servier pharmaceuticals, 200 Pier Four Blvd, Boston, MA, 02210, USA.
Gianna McMillanBioethics Institute at Loyola Marymount University, 1 LMU Drive, Los Angeles, CA, 90045, USA.
Robert A BeckmanLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and Innovation Center for Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Pfizer (United States) · USBayer (United States) · USBoston University · USBristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USGeorgetown University · USLoyola Marymount University · USModerna Therapeutics (United States) · USVertex Pharmaceuticals (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional clinical trials require tests and procedures that are administered in centralized clinical research sites, which are beyond the standard of care that patients receive for their rare and chronic diseases. The limited number of rare disease patients scattered around the world makes it particularly challenging to recruit participants and conduct these traditional clinical trials. MAIN BODY: Participating in clinical research can be burdensome, especially for children, the elderly, physically and cognitively impaired individuals who require transportation and caregiver assistance, or patients who live in remote locations or cannot afford transportation. In recent years, there is an increasing need to consider Decentralized Clinical Trials (DCT) as a participant-centric approach that uses new technologies and innovative procedures for interaction with participants in the comfort of their home.

conclusionThis paper discusses the planning and conduct of DCTs, which can increase the quality of trials with a specific focus on rare diseases.

Indexed as

CaregiversRare DiseasesAgedChildClinical Trials as TopicHumansAdvanced AnalyticsClinical TrialDecentralized Clinical TrialsDigital Health TechnologiesPilot StudyRare DiseaseReal World Data

Identifiers

PMID37041605
PMCPMC10088572
OpenAlexW4364379883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.