Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37041570›Full record

ArticleCell & bioscience2023

Improving the response to oxaliplatin by targeting chemotherapy-induced CLDN1 in resistant metastatic colorectal cancer cells.

Sara Cherradi, Véronique Garambois, Johanna Marines, Augusto Faria Andrade, Alexandra Fauvre, Olivia Morand, Manon Fargal, Ferial Mancouri, Adeline Ayrolles-Torro, Nadia Vezzo-Vié and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell & bioscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prognostic Significance ofBiomedicines · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Why Is Wnt/β-Catenin Not Yet Targeted in Routine Cancer Care?Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sara CherradiInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 208 rue des Apothicaires, Montpellier Cedex 5, F-34298, France.
Véronique GaramboisInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 208 rue des Apothicaires, Montpellier Cedex 5, F-34298, France.
Johanna MarinesInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 208 rue des Apothicaires, Montpellier Cedex 5, F-34298, France.
Augusto Faria AndradeInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 208 rue des Apothicaires, Montpellier Cedex 5, F-34298, France.
Alexandra FauvreInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 208 rue des Apothicaires, Montpellier Cedex 5, F-34298, France.
Olivia MorandInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 208 rue des Apothicaires, Montpellier Cedex 5, F-34298, France.
Manon FargalInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 208 rue des Apothicaires, Montpellier Cedex 5, F-34298, France.
Ferial MancouriInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 208 rue des Apothicaires, Montpellier Cedex 5, F-34298, France.
Adeline Ayrolles-TorroInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 208 rue des Apothicaires, Montpellier Cedex 5, F-34298, France.
Nadia Vezzo-ViéInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 208 rue des Apothicaires, Montpellier Cedex 5, F-34298, France.
Marta JarlierInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 208 rue des Apothicaires, Montpellier Cedex 5, F-34298, France.
Gerald LoussaintInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 208 rue des Apothicaires, Montpellier Cedex 5, F-34298, France.
Steve HuvelleGICC, Team IMT, University of Tours, Tours, 7501, F-37032, France.
Nicolas JoubertGICC, Team IMT, University of Tours, Tours, 7501, F-37032, France.
Thibault MazardInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 208 rue des Apothicaires, Montpellier Cedex 5, F-34298, France.
Céline GongoraInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 208 rue des Apothicaires, Montpellier Cedex 5, F-34298, France.
Philippe PourquierInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 208 rue des Apothicaires, Montpellier Cedex 5, F-34298, France.
Florence Boissière-MichotInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 208 rue des Apothicaires, Montpellier Cedex 5, F-34298, France.
Maguy Del RioInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 208 rue des Apothicaires, Montpellier Cedex 5, F-34298, France. maguy.delrio@icm.unicancer.fr.
Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FRInserm · FRUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

Conseil Régional du Centre-Val de Loire APR IR 2017Investissement D'avenir of the Labex MabImprove ANR-10-LABX-53-01Ligue Contre le Cancer Ligue Contre le CancerSIRIC Montpellier Cancer INCa_Inserm_DGOS_12553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTumor resistance is a frequent cause of therapy failure and remains a major challenge for the long-term management of colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study was to determine the implication of the tight junctional protein claudin 1 (CLDN1) in the acquired resistance to chemotherapy.

methodsImmunohistochemistry was used to determine CLDN1 expression in post-chemotherapy liver metastases from 58 CRC patients. The effects of oxaliplatin on membrane CLDN1 expression were evaluated by flow cytometry, immunofluorescence and western blotting experiments in vitro and in vivo. Phosphoproteome analyses, proximity ligation and luciferase reporter assays were used to unravel the mechanism of CLDN1 induction. RNAseq experiments were performed on oxaliplatin-resistant cell lines to investigate the role of CLDN1 in chemoresistance. The "one-two punch" sequential combination of oxaliplatin followed by an anti-CLDN1 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) was tested in both CRC cell lines and murine models.

resultsWe found a significant correlation between CLDN1 expression level and histologic response to chemotherapy, CLDN1 expression being the highest in resistant metastatic residual cells of patients showing minor responses. Moreover, in both murine xenograft model and CRC cell lines, CLDN1 expression was upregulated after exposure to conventional chemotherapies used in CRC treatment. CLDN1 overexpression was, at least in part, functionally related to the activation of the MAPKp38/GSK3β/Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Overexpression of CLDN1 was also observed in oxaliplatin-resistant CRC cell lines and was associated with resistance to apoptosis, suggesting an anti-apoptotic role for CLDN1. Finally, we demonstrated that the sequential treatment with oxaliplatin followed by an anti-CLDN1 ADC displayed a synergistic effect in vitro and in in vivo.

conclusionOur study identifies CLDN1 as a new biomarker of acquired resistance to chemotherapy in CRC patients and suggests that a "one-two punch" approach targeting chemotherapy-induced CLDN1 expression may represent a therapeutic opportunity to circumvent resistance and to improve the outcome of patients with advanced CRC.

Indexed as

ADCBiomarkerChemotherapyCLDN1Colorectal cancer“One-two punch”Resistance

Identifiers

PMID37041570
PMCPMC10091849
OpenAlexW4364375960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.