Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37041511›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

The association of physician assistant/associate demographic and practice characteristics with perceptions of value of certification.

Andrzej Kozikowski, Dawn Morton-Rias, Kasey Puckett, Colette Jeffery, Sheila Mauldin, Joshua Goodman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Factors associated with PAs' choice of the traditional PANRE over the PANRE-LA.JAAPA : official journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants · 2026
    Article
  2. Physician assistant legalization and conflicts in South Korea: need for an approach based on lessons from three countries.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrzej KozikowskiNational Commission on Certification of Physician Assistants, 12000 Findley Road, Suite 100, Johns Creek, GA, 30097, USA.
Dawn Morton-RiasNational Commission on Certification of Physician Assistants, 12000 Findley Road, Suite 100, Johns Creek, GA, 30097, USA.
Kasey PuckettNational Commission on Certification of Physician Assistants, 12000 Findley Road, Suite 100, Johns Creek, GA, 30097, USA. kaseyk@nccpa.net.
Colette JefferyNational Commission on Certification of Physician Assistants, 12000 Findley Road, Suite 100, Johns Creek, GA, 30097, USA.
Sheila MauldinNational Commission on Certification of Physician Assistants, 12000 Findley Road, Suite 100, Johns Creek, GA, 30097, USA.
Joshua GoodmanNational Commission on Certification of Physician Assistants, 12000 Findley Road, Suite 100, Johns Creek, GA, 30097, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo determine physician assistant/associate (PA) perceptions of the value of certification and explore how they vary across demographic and practice characteristics.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional online survey between March and April 2020 with PAs participating in the longitudinal pilot program for recertification administered by the National Commission on Certification of Physician Assistants (NCCPA). The survey was distributed to 18,147 PAs, of which 10,965 participated (60.4% response rate). In addition to descriptive statistics, chi-square tests were conducted on demographics and specialty to examine if perceptions of value of certification (1 global and 10 items measuring specific domains) were associated with a particular PA profile. A series of fully adjusted multivariate logistic regressions were performed, exploring the relationship between PA characteristics and the value of certification items.

resultsMost PAs strongly agreed/agreed that certification helps with fulfilling licensure requirements (9,578/10,893; 87.9%), helps with updating medical knowledge (9,372/10,897; 86.0%), and provides objective evidence of continued competence (8,875/10,902; 81.4%). The items receiving the lowest percentage of responses for strongly agreeing/agreeing were for certification providing no value (1,925/10,887; 17.7%), helping with professional liability insurance (5,076/10,889; 46.6%), and competing with other providers for clinical positions (5,661/10,905; 51.9%). Age 55 and older and practicing in dermatology and psychiatry were among the strongest predictors of less favorable views. PAs from underrepresented in medicine (URiM) backgrounds had more positive perceptions.

conclusionsOverall, the findings indicate that PAs value certification; however, perceptions varied by demographics and specialties. PAs who were younger, from URiM backgrounds, and practicing in primary care specialties had among the most favorable perspectives. Continued feedback monitoring is critical in ensuring certification is relevant and meaningful in supporting PAs across demographics and specialties. Measuring PA perceptions of the value of certification is essential to understanding how to support the PA profession's current and future credentialing needs and those who license and hire PAs.

Indexed as

Physician AssistantsPsychiatryCertificationCross-Sectional StudiesDemographyHumansMiddle AgedPAPerceptions of certificationPhysician assistantsPhysician associateRecertificationValue of certification

Identifiers

PMID37041511
PMCPMC10088160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.