ArticleBMC surgery2023
Comparison of the efficacy of ETS with different segments for palmar, axillary and plantar hyperhidrosis.
Article in BMC surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo compare the near and long-term outcomes of endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy (ETS) for palmar, axillary and plantar hyperhidrosis.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 218 patients with hyperhidrosis who were admitted to the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Gansu Provincial People's Hospital for surgical treatment from April 2014 to August 2021. The patients were divided into three groups according to the method of ETS and the perioperative clinical data and postoperative follow-up data were collected to compare the near and long term outcomes of the three groups.
resultsThere were 197 eligible patients at follow-up, 60 patients in the R4 cut-off group, 95 patients in the R3 + R4 cut-off group and 42 patients in the R4 + R5 cut-off group. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline indicators such as sex, age and positive family history among the three groups (P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in terms of operative time (P = 0.148), intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.308) and postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.407). Postoperatively, all three groups showed significant relief of palmar hyperhidrosis symptoms, with the R3 + R4 group having an advantage in terms of relief of axillary hyperhidrosis symptoms, patient satisfaction and quality of life index at 6 months postoperatively and the R4 + R5 group having an advantage in terms of relief of plantar hyperhidrosis symptoms. The difference in compensatory hyperhidrosis at 12 months postoperatively was not statistically significant among the three groups (P = 0.867), but the incidence was higher in the R3 + R4 and R4 + R5 groups than that in the R4 group.
conclusionPatients with simple palmar hyperhidrosis can first consider R4 cut-off treatment; R3 + R4 cut-off is more effective in treating palmar hyperhidrosis combined with axillary hyperhidrosis; R4 + R5 cut-off is more effective in treating palmar hyperhidrosis combined with plantar hyperhidrosis. However, patients need to be informed that R3 + R4 and R4 + R5 dissection may increase the risk of severe compensatory hyperhidrosis after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.