Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37041468›Full record

Trial reportBMC gastroenterology2023

Development and validation of nomograms for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in elderly patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: a population-based study.

Yuqi Sun, Zequn Li, Yulong Tian, Chao Gao, Benjia Liang, Shougen Cao, Xiaodong Liu, Xuechao Liu, Cheng Meng, Jianfei Xu and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yuqi SunDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China.
Zequn LiDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China.
Yulong TianDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China.
Chao GaoQilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Benjia LiangShandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Shougen CaoDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China.
Xiaodong LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China.
Xuechao LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China.
Cheng MengDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China.
Jianfei XuDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China.
Hao YangDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China.
Yanbing ZhouDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China. zhouyanbing@qduhospital.cn.
Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University · CNQingdao University · CNQilu Hospital of Shandong University · CNShandong Provincial Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the multiple factors influencing the survival of elderly patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) and develop and validate the novel nomograms for predicting the survival.

methodsThe clinical features of patients treated between 2000 and 2018 were collected and collated from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and three medical centres in China, and the patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (3494), internal validation cohort (1497) and external validation cohort (841). Univariate and multivariate analyses of the prognostic values were performed to identify independent prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS), and two nomogram models were developed. Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and calibration curves were employed to assess discrimination and calibration. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to investigate the clinical usefulness.

resultsIn the SEER database, the 5-year OS of the patients was 31.08%, while the 5-year CSS of the patients was 44.09%. Furthermore, in the external validation set, the 5-year OS of the patients was 49.58%, and the 5-year CSS of these patients was 53.51%. After statistical analysis, nine independent prognostic factors of OS and CSS were identified, including age, race, tumour size, differentiation, TNM stage, gastrectomy type, lymph node metastasis (LNM), lymph node ratio (LNR) and chemotherapy. The C-index (approximately 0.7) and calibration curve (close to the optimal calibration line) indicated satisfactory discrimination and calibration of the nomogram. DCA and ROC curves showed that the developed nomogram was superior to TNM stage.

conclusionThe novel validated nomogram could accurately predict the prognosis of individual elderly patients with LAGC and guide the selection of clinical treatment measures.

Indexed as

Neoplasms, Second PrimaryStomach NeoplasmsAgedGastrectomyHumansNomogramsResearch DesignElderlyLocally advanced gastric cancerNomogramSurvival

Identifiers

PMID37041468
PMCPMC10091668
OpenAlexW4364363441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.