Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37041463›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2023

Genetic diversity analysis in wheat cultivars using SCoT and ISSR markers, chloroplast DNA barcoding and grain SEM.

Heba H Abouseada, Al-Safa H Mohamed, Samir S Teleb, Abdelfattah Badr, Mohamed E Tantawy, Shafik D Ibrahim, Faten Y Ellmouni, Mohamed Ibrahim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
15.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Organelle Genomes ofBiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Genetic diversity analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Heba H AbouseadaDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Al-Safa H MohamedDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Samir S TelebBotany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44519, Sharqia, Egypt.
Abdelfattah BadrBotany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed E TantawyDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Shafik D IbrahimAgricultural Genetic Engineering Research Institute (AGERI), Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Giza, Egypt.
Faten Y EllmouniBotany Department, Faculty of Science, Fayoum University, 63514, Fayoum, Egypt. fyl00@fayoum.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9463-0008
Mohamed IbrahimDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. m.shehata@sci.asu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5401-5115
Ain Shams University · EGAgricultural Genetic Engineering Research Institute · EGFayoum University · EGHelwan University · EGZagazig University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWheat is a major cereal that can narrow the gap between the increasing human population and food production. In this connection, assessing genetic diversity and conserving wheat genetic resources for future exploitation is very important for breeding new cultivars that may withstand the expected climate change. The current study evaluates the genetic diversity in selected wheat cultivars using ISSR and SCoT markers, the rbcL and matK chloroplast DNA barcoding, and grain surface sculpture characteristics. We anticipate that these objectives may prioritize using the selected cultivars to improve wheat production. The selected collection of cultivars may lead to the identification of cultivars adapted to a broad spectrum of climatic environments.

resultsMultivariate clustering analyses of the ISSR and SCoT DNA fingerprinting polymorphism grouped three Egyptian cultivars with cultivar El-Nielain from Sudan, cultivar Aguilal from Morocco, and cultivar Attila from Mexico. In the other group, cultivar Cook from Australia and cultivar Chinese-166 were differentiated from four other cultivars: cultivar Cham-10 from Syria, cultivar Seri-82 from Mexico, cultivar Inqalab-91 from Pakistan, and cultivar Sonalika from India. In the PCA analysis, the Egyptian cultivars were distinct from the other studied cultivars. The rbcL and matK sequence variation analysis indicated similarities between Egyptian cultivars and cultivar Cham-10 from Syria and cultivar Inqalab-91 from Pakistan, whereas cultivar Attila from Mexico was distinguished from all other cultivars. Combining the data of ISSR and SCoT with the rbcL and matK results retained the close resemblance among the two Egyptian cultivars EGY1: Gemmeiza-9 and EGY3: Sakha-93, and the Moroccan cultivar Aguilal, and the Sudanese cultivar El-Nielain and between Seri-82, Inqalab-91, and Sonalika cultivars. The analysis of all data distinguished cultivar Cham-10 from Syria from all other cultivars, and the analysis of grain traits indicated a close resemblance between cv. Cham-10 from and the two Egyptian cultivars Gemmeiza-9 and Sakha-93.

conclusionsThe analysis of rbcL and matK chloroplast DNA barcoding agrees with the ISSR and the SCoT markers in supporting the close resemblance between the Egyptian cultivars, particularly Gemmeiza-9 and Sakha-93. The ISSR and SCoT data analyses significantly expressed high differentiation levels among the examined cultivars. Cultivars with closer resemblance may be recommended for breeding new wheat cultivars adapted to various climatic environments.

Indexed as

DNA, ChloroplastTriticumEdible GrainHumansPlant BreedingPolymorphism, GeneticDNA, ChloroplastChloroplast DNA barcodesGenetic diversityGrain exomorphic characteristicsMolecular markersWheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Identifiers

PMID37041463
PMCPMC10088244
OpenAlexW4364359865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.