Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37041457›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2023

Simulating complex patient populations with hierarchical learning effects to support methods development for post-market surveillance.

Sharon E Davis, Henry Ssemaganda, Jejo D Koola, Jialin Mao, Dax Westerman, Theodore Speroff, Usha S Govindarajulu, Craig R Ramsay, Art Sedrakyan, Lucila Ohno-Machado and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A machine learning framework to adjust for learning effects in medical device safety evaluation.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Sharon E DavisDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Ave, Suite 1475, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA. sharon.e.davis.1@vumc.org.
Henry SsemagandaComparative Effectiveness Research Institute, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, 41 Mall Road, Burlington, MA, 01803, USA.
Jejo D KoolaUC Health Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr. MC 0728, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92093-0728, USA.
Jialin MaoDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Dax WestermanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Ave, Suite 1475, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA.
Theodore SperoffDepartments of Medicine and Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1313 21St Avenue South, Oxford House, Room 209, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
Usha S GovindarajuluCenter for Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1077, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Craig R RamsayHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, 3rd Floor, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
Art SedrakyanDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Lucila Ohno-MachadoBiomedical Informatics and Data Science, Yale School of Medicine, 100 College Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
Frederic S Resnic *Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and Comparative Effectiveness Research Institute, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 41 Burlington Mall Road, Burlington, MA, 01805, USA.
Michael E Matheny *Departments of Biomedical Informatics, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Ave, Suite 1475, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USCornell University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USLahey Hospital and Medical Center · USTufts University · USUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of California San Diego · USVA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System · USYale University · US

Funding

Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jeffrey L Neul · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Incorporating Learning Effects into Medical Device Active Safety Surveillance MethodsR01HL149948 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MATHENY, MICHAEL E., RESNIC, FREDERIC S · 2020 to 2023
$3.1M
Chief Scientist Office HSRU1NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL149948NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundValidating new algorithms, such as methods to disentangle intrinsic treatment risk from risk associated with experiential learning of novel treatments, often requires knowing the ground truth for data characteristics under investigation. Since the ground truth is inaccessible in real world data, simulation studies using synthetic datasets that mimic complex clinical environments are essential. We describe and evaluate a generalizable framework for injecting hierarchical learning effects within a robust data generation process that incorporates the magnitude of intrinsic risk and accounts for known critical elements in clinical data relationships.

methodsWe present a multi-step data generating process with customizable options and flexible modules to support a variety of simulation requirements. Synthetic patients with nonlinear and correlated features are assigned to provider and institution case series. The probability of treatment and outcome assignment are associated with patient features based on user definitions. Risk due to experiential learning by providers and/or institutions when novel treatments are introduced is injected at various speeds and magnitudes. To further reflect real-world complexity, users can request missing values and omitted variables. We illustrate an implementation of our method in a case study using MIMIC-III data for reference patient feature distributions.

resultsRealized data characteristics in the simulated data reflected specified values. Apparent deviations in treatment effects and feature distributions, though not statistically significant, were most common in small datasets (n < 3000) and attributable to random noise and variability in estimating realized values in small samples. When learning effects were specified, synthetic datasets exhibited changes in the probability of an adverse outcomes as cases accrued for the treatment group impacted by learning and stable probabilities as cases accrued for the treatment group not affected by learning.

conclusionsOur framework extends clinical data simulation techniques beyond generation of patient features to incorporate hierarchical learning effects. This enables the complex simulation studies required to develop and rigorously test algorithms developed to disentangle treatment safety signals from the effects of experiential learning. By supporting such efforts, this work can help identify training opportunities, avoid unwarranted restriction of access to medical advances, and hasten treatment improvements.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansHierarchical learning effectsLearning effectsMedical devicesPost-market safety surveillanceSimulationsSynthetic clinical data

Identifiers

PMID37041457
PMCPMC10088292
OpenAlexW4364377242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.