Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37041415›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Nephrology2023

Network medicine: an approach to complex kidney disease phenotypes.

Arvind K Pandey, Joseph Loscalzo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Graph neural networks for computational nephrology.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Disease gene prioritization with quantum walks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  5. Network Medicine: A Potential Approach for Virtual Drug Screening.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. D'or: deep orienter of protein-protein interaction networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  7. The Promise and Challenges of Metabolomic Studies in Pediatric CKD.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arvind K PandeyDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7890-4665
Joseph LoscalzoDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. jloscalzo@rics.bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1153-8047

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientific reductionism has been the basis of disease classification and understanding for more than a century. However, the reductionist approach of characterizing diseases from a limited set of clinical observations and laboratory evaluations has proven insufficient in the face of an exponential growth in data generated from transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics and deep phenotyping. A new systematic method is necessary to organize these datasets and build new definitions of what constitutes a disease that incorporates both biological and environmental factors to more precisely describe the ever-growing complexity of phenotypes and their underlying molecular determinants. Network medicine provides such a conceptual framework to bridge these vast quantities of data while providing an individualized understanding of disease. The modern application of network medicine principles is yielding new insights into the pathobiology of chronic kidney diseases and renovascular disorders by expanding the understanding of pathogenic mediators, novel biomarkers and new options for renal therapeutics. These efforts affirm network medicine as a robust paradigm for elucidating new advances in the diagnosis and treatment of kidney disorders.

Indexed as

Kidney DiseasesProteomicsGene Expression ProfilingHumansMetabolomicsPhenotype

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.