Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37041402›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2023

Screening practices of cancer survivors and individuals whose family or friends had a cancer diagnoses-a nationally representative cross-sectional survey in Japan (INFORM Study 2020).

Miki Akiyama, Noriyuki Ishida, Hiroyasu Takahashi, Miyako Takahashi, Aki Otsuki, Yasunori Sato, Junko Saito, Akiko Yaguchi-Saito, Maiko Fujimori, Yuki Kaji and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Miki AkiyamaFaculty of Information Studies, Keio University, Fujisawa City, Kanagawa, Japan. miki@sfc.keio.ac.jp.
Noriyuki IshidaBiostatistics Unit, Clinical and Translational Research Center, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyasu TakahashiDivision of Screening Assessment and Management, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Miyako TakahashiJapan Cancer Survivorship Network, Tokyo, Japan.
Aki OtsukiDivision of Behavioral Sciences, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasunori SatoBiostatistics Unit, Clinical and Translational Research Center, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Junko SaitoDivision of Behavioral Sciences, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Akiko Yaguchi-SaitoDivision of Behavioral Sciences, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Maiko FujimoriDivision of Supportive Care, Survivorship and Translational Research, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuki KajiDivision of Behavioral Sciences, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Taichi ShimazuDivision of Behavioral Sciences, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
INFORM Study Group
Keio University Hospital · JPIwate Medical University · JPKeio University Shonan Fujisawa · JPTokiwa University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe examined cancer screening practices and related beliefs in cancer survivors and individuals with family or close friends with a cancer diagnosis compared to individuals without the above cancer history for 5 population-based (gastric, colorectal, lung, breast, cervical) and 1 opportunistic (prostate) cancer screenings using nationally representative cross-sectional survey in Japan.

methodsWe analyzed 3269 data from 3605 respondents (response rate, 37.1%) and compared the screening beliefs and practices of cancer survivors (n = 391), individuals with family members (n = 1674), and close friends with a cancer diagnosis (n = 685) to those without any cancer history (n = 519).

resultsBeing a cancer survivor was associated with screening for gastric (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.04-2.95), colorectal (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.03-2.36), and lung cancer (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.10-2.66) but not breast, cervical cancer or PSA test. Having a family cancer diagnosis was associated with colorectal and lung cancer screening. Having friends with a cancer diagnosis was associated with PSA test. Cancer survivors and family members perceived themselves as being more susceptible and worried about getting cancer than individuals without any cancer history. Cancer survivors strongly believed screening can detect cancer and were more likely to undergo screening. Subgroup analysis indicated an interrelation between gastric and colorectal cancer screening among survivors.

conclusionsA cancer diagnosis in oneself or family or friend influences an individual's health-related belief and risk perception, which can increase the likelihood of cancer screening. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Targeted and tailored communication strategies can increase awareness of cancer screening.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsColorectal NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsProstatic NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFriendsHumansJapanMaleMass ScreeningProstate-Specific AntigenProstate-Specific AntigenCancer diagnosis in familyCancer diagnosis in friendCancer screeningCancer survivorHealth belief modelScreening behavior

Identifiers

PMID37041402
PMCPMC10089820
OpenAlexW4365135059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.