Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37041387›Full record

ReviewOperative Orthopadie und Traumatologie2023

Commercially manufactured spacers for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection of the hip.

Max Jaenisch, Soufian Ben Amar, Mari Babasiz, Charlotte Rommelspacher, Matthias Dominik Wimmer, Dieter Christian Wirtz, Thomas Martin Randau

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Max JaenischKlinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53105, Bonn, Germany.
Soufian Ben AmarKlinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53105, Bonn, Germany.
Mari BabasizKlinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53105, Bonn, Germany.
Charlotte RommelspacherKlinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53105, Bonn, Germany.
Matthias Dominik WimmerKlinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53105, Bonn, Germany.
Dieter Christian WirtzKlinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53105, Bonn, Germany.
Thomas Martin RandauKlinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53105, Bonn, Germany. thomas.randau@ukbonn.de.
University Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeriprosthetic joint infection remains a common and serious complication after hip arthroplasty. To improve function and patient comfort after joint removal in two-stage revision, commercially manufactured spacers for the hip joint allow retention of the anatomical joint geometry thereby limiting soft tissue contraction and allow mobilization. INDICATIONS: Periprosthetic joint infection of the hip, septic arthritis with severe destruction of the hip cartilage and/or bone requiring arthroplasty. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Allergies to polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or antibiotics, severe hip dysplasia with insufficient cranial support, incompliant patient, large osseous defect of the acetabulum, insufficient metaphyseal/diaphyseal support of the femoral bone, resistance of the microbiological pathogen to spacer-inert antibiotic medication, inability to perform primary wound closure requiring temporary open-wound therapy. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Preoperative templating on radiograph; removal of joint prosthesis and thorough debridement with removal of all foreign material; trial spacer selection and insertion and trial reduction of the joint, fixing the spacer with PMMA to the proximal femur, final reduction, radiograph and stability test.

resultsData were analyzed from patients treated between 2016 and 2021. In all, 20 patients were treated with preformed spacers and 16 with custom-made spacers. Pathogens were detected in 23 of the 36 cases (64%). Polymicrobial infections were present in 8 of 36 cases (22%). In patients who received preformed spacers, there were 6 cases of spacer-related complications (30%). Of the 36 patients (83%), 30 were reimplanted with a new implant; 3 patients died due to septic or other complications before reimplantation (8%). Average follow-up was 20.2 months after reimplantation. There were no major differences between the two groups of spacers. Patient comfort was not measured.

Indexed as

Arthritis, InfectiousArthroplasty, Replacement, HipJoint ProsthesisProsthesis-Related InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansPolymethyl MethacrylateReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsPolymethyl MethacrylateArthroplastyGirdlestonePolymethylmethacrylateRevisionTwo-stage exchange

Identifiers

PMID37041387
OpenAlexW4364380377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.