Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37041316›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Avatar-based patient monitoring improves information transfer, diagnostic confidence and reduces perceived workload in intensive care units: computer-based, multicentre comparison study.

Lisa Bergauer, Julia Braun, Tadzio Raoul Roche, Patrick Meybohm, Sebastian Hottenrott, Kai Zacharowski, Florian Jürgen Raimann, Eva Rivas, Manuel López-Baamonde, Michael Thomas Ganter and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Digital twins for chronic lung diseases.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Lisa BergauerInstitute of Anaesthesiology, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Julia BraunDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Tadzio Raoul RocheInstitute of Anaesthesiology, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. Tadzioraoul.roche@usz.ch.
Patrick MeybohmDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Wuerzburg, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Sebastian HottenrottDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Wuerzburg, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Kai ZacharowskiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Florian Jürgen RaimannDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Eva RivasDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Manuel López-BaamondeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Michael Thomas GanterInstitute of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Clinic Hirslanden Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christoph Beat NöthigerInstitute of Anaesthesiology, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Donat R SpahnInstitute of Anaesthesiology, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
David Werner TschollInstitute of Anaesthesiology, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Samira AkbasInstitute of Anaesthesiology, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversitat de Barcelona · ESUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEKlinik Hirslanden · CHUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient monitoring is the foundation of intensive care medicine. High workload and information overload can impair situation awareness of staff, thus leading to loss of important information about patients' conditions. To facilitate mental processing of patient monitoring data, we developed the Visual-Patient-avatar Intensive Care Unit (ICU), a virtual patient model animated from vital signs and patient installation data. It incorporates user-centred design principles to foster situation awareness. This study investigated the avatar's effects on information transfer measured by performance, diagnostic confidence and perceived workload. This computer-based study compared Visual-Patient-avatar ICU and conventional monitor modality for the first time. We recruited 25 nurses and 25 physicians from five centres. The participants completed an equal number of scenarios in both modalities. Information transfer, as the primary outcome, was defined as correctly assessing vital signs and installations. Secondary outcomes included diagnostic confidence and perceived workload. For analysis, we used mixed models and matched odds ratios. Comparing 250 within-subject cases revealed that Visual-Patient-avatar ICU led to a higher rate of correctly assessed vital signs and installations [rate ratio (RR) 1.25; 95% CI 1.19-1.31; P < 0.001], strengthened diagnostic confidence [odds ratio (OR) 3.32; 95% CI 2.15-5.11, P < 0.001] and lowered perceived workload (coefficient - 7.62; 95% CI - 9.17 to - 6.07; P < 0.001) than conventional modality. Using Visual-Patient-avatar ICU, participants retrieved more information with higher diagnostic confidence and lower perceived workload compared to the current industry standard monitor.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsWorkloadAwarenessComputersHumansMonitoring, Physiologic

Identifiers

PMID37041316
PMCPMC10088750
OpenAlexW4364375390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.