Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2023
Nirmatrelvir and risk of hospital admission or death in adults with covid-19: emulation of a randomized target trial using electronic health records.
Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir for Outpatients in the Era of Omicron, Vaccination, and Previous Infection: A Meta-analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Real-world untreated risk of hospitalization and death in a nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment-eligible population with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in the United States: a systematic literature review.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Methodological challenges using routine clinical care data for real-world evidence: a rapid review utilizing a systematic literature search and focus group discussion.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir in non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2024Pooled it
- Nirmatrelvir combined with ritonavir for preventing and treating COVID-19.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Phenotyping antidepressant treatment response with deep learning in electronic health records.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Design and Implementation of Observational Studies Emulating a Target Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- GLP-1 receptor agonists and risk of all cause and cause specific acute pancreatitis: target trial emulation.BMJ medicine · 2026Article
- Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Efficacy in Immunocompetent Patients with Confirmed Omicron Variant of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of research in pharmacy practice · 2026Review
- Association of Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir with intubation or mortality risks in severe COVID-19 patients: a comparative study.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Insights into potential therapeutic approaches for long COVID.Frontiers of medicine · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Early COVID-19 Treatment Efficacy in a Multicentric Regional Cohort in Italy: Emulation of a Series of Target Trials.Journal of medical virology · 2025Article
- Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Azvudine for Elderly Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: A Multicenter, Retrospective, Real-World Study.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Management of SARS-CoV-2 Infection-Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Polish Association of Epidemiologists and Infectiologists, for 2025.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Mapping the effectiveness and risks of GLP-1 receptor agonists.Nature medicine · 2025 · on this mapArticle
- Effect of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) on hospitalization among adults with COVID-19: An electronic health record-based target trial emulation from N3C.PLoS medicine · 2025Article
- Nationwide Target Trial Emulation Evaluating the Clinical Effectiveness of Oral Antivirals for COVID-19 in Korea.Journal of Korean medical science · 2024Article
- Adverse cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in people with SARS-CoV-2 treated with SGLT2 inhibitors.Communications medicine · 2024Article
- Proportion of Patients in the United States Who Fill Their Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Prescriptions.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2024Article
- Real-world application of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with onset of symptoms beyond 5 days: a comparative study.Infection · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo estimate the effectiveness of nirmatrelvir, compared with no treatment, in reducing admission to hospital or death at 30 days in people infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and at risk of developing severe disease, according to vaccination status and history of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection.
designEmulation of a randomized target trial with electronic health records.
settingHealthcare databases of the US Department of Veterans Affairs
participants256 288 participants with a SARS-CoV-2 positive test result and at least one risk factor for developing severe covid-19 disease, between 3 January and 30 November 2022. 31 524 were treated with nirmatrelvir within five days of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 and 224 764 received no treatment.
main outcome measuresThe effectiveness of starting nirmatrelvir within five days of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result versus no treatment in reducing the risk of admission to hospital or death at 30 days was estimated in those who were not vaccinated, in those who received one or two doses of vaccine, and those who received a vaccine booster and, separately, in participants with a primary SARS-CoV-2 infection or reinfection. The inverse probability weighting method was used to balance personal and health characteristics between the groups. Relative risk and absolute risk reduction were computed from cumulative incidence at 30 days, estimated by weighted Kaplan-Meier estimator.
resultsAmong people who were not vaccinated (n=76 763; 5338 nirmatrelvir and 71 425 no treatment), compared with no treatment, the relative risk of nirmatrelvir in reducing admission to hospital or death at 30 days was 0.60 (95% confidence interval 0.50 to 0.71); the absolute risk reduction was 1.83% (95% confidence interval 1.29% to 2.49%). The relative risk and absolute risk reduction, compared with no treatment, were 0.65 (0.57 to 0.74) and 1.27% (0.90% to 1.61%), respectively, in people who received one or two doses of vaccine (n=84 620; 7989 nirmatrelvir and 76 631 no treatment); 0.64 (0.58 to 0.71) and 1.05% (0.85% to 1.27%) in individuals who received a booster dose of vaccine (n=94 905; 18 197 nirmatrelvir and 76 708 no treatment); 0.61 (0.57 to 0.65) and 1.36% (1.19% to 1.53%) in participants with a primary SARS-CoV-2 infection (n=228 081; 26 350 nirmatrelvir and 201 731 no treatment); and 0.74 (0.63 to 0.87) and 0.79% (0.36% to 1.18%) in participants who were reinfected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus (n=28 207; 5174 nirmatrelvir and 23 033 no treatment). Nirmatrelvir was associated with a reduced risk of admission to hospital or death in those aged ≤65 years and > 65 years; in men and women; in black and white participants; in those with 1-2, 3-4, and ≥5 risk factors for progression to severe covid-19 illness; and in those infected during the omicron BA.1 or BA.2 predominant era, and the BA.5 predominant era.
conclusionsIn people with SARS-CoV-2 infection who were at risk of developing severe disease, compared with no treatment, nirmatrelvir was associated with a reduced risk of admission to hospital or death at 30 days in people who were not vaccinated, vaccinated, and had received a booster vaccine, and in those with a primary SARS-CoV-2 infection and reinfection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.