Endoscopic resection using adaptive traction for a large recurrence after a full-thickness transanal endoscopic microsurgery: improving exposure is a key point for complete removal.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

1. A simple and low impact glove tip to achieve colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection with adaptive traction in patients with stoma.Endoscopy · 2024
   Article
2. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual gastric lesion made easier thanks to use of adaptative traction device.Endoscopy · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for treatment of rectal tumors: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis.2020

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as