Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37040495›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2023

Rice Plant Counting, Locating, and Sizing Method Based on High-Throughput UAV RGB Images.

Xiaodong Bai, Pichao Liu, Zhiguo Cao, Hao Lu, Haipeng Xiong, Aiping Yang, Zhe Cai, Jianjun Wang, Jianguo Yao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiaodong BaiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China.
Pichao LiuSchool of Telecommunication and Information Engineering, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China.
Zhiguo CaoSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.
Hao LuSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.
Haipeng XiongSchool of Computing, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore.
Aiping YangAgricultural Meteorological Center, Jiangxi Meteorological Bureau, Nanchang 330045, China.
Zhe CaiAgricultural Meteorological Center, Jiangxi Meteorological Bureau, Nanchang 330045, China.
Jianjun WangAgricultural Meteorological Center, Jiangxi Meteorological Bureau, Nanchang 330045, China.
Jianguo YaoSchool of Telecommunication and Information Engineering, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rice plant counting is crucial for many applications in rice production, such as yield estimation, growth diagnosis, disaster loss assessment, etc. Currently, rice counting still heavily relies on tedious and time-consuming manual operation. To alleviate the workload of rice counting, we employed an UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle) to collect the RGB images of the paddy field. Then, we proposed a new rice plant counting, locating, and sizing method (RiceNet), which consists of one feature extractor frontend and 3 feature decoder modules, namely, density map estimator, plant location detector, and plant size estimator. In RiceNet, rice plant attention mechanism and positive-negative loss are designed to improve the ability to distinguish plants from background and the quality of the estimated density maps. To verify the validity of our method, we propose a new UAV-based rice counting dataset, which contains 355 images and 257,793 manual labeled points. Experiment results show that the mean absolute error and root mean square error of the proposed RiceNet are 8.6 and 11.2, respectively. Moreover, we validated the performance of our method with two other popular crop datasets. On these three datasets, our method significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods. Results suggest that RiceNet can accurately and efficiently estimate the number of rice plants and replace the traditional manual method.

Identifiers

PMID37040495
PMCPMC10076056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.