Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37040376›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Factors associated with research participation in a large primary care practice-based pediatric cohort: Results from the TARGet Kids! longitudinal cohort study.

Xuedi Li, Charles D G Keown-Stoneman, Cornelia M Borkhoff, Peter D Wong, Dana Arafeh, Erika Tavares, Sharon Thadani, Jonathon L Maguire, Catherine S Birken, TARGet Kids! Collaboration

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Reply to C Pang and L Zhao.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination in young children.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xuedi LiChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6331-593X
Charles D G Keown-StonemanLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Cornelia M BorkhoffChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Peter D WongChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dana ArafehDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Erika TavaresPatient Partner, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sharon ThadaniLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jonathon L MaguireLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Catherine S BirkenChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
TARGet Kids! Collaboration
University of Toronto · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CAHospital for Sick Children · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAll longitudinal cohort studies strive for high participant retention, although attrition is common. Understanding determinants of attrition is important to inform and develop targeted strategies to improve study participation. We aimed to identify factors associated with research participation in a large children's primary care cohort study.

methodsIn this longitudinal cohort study between 2008 and 2020, all children who participated in the Applied Research Group for Kids (TARGet Kids!) were included. TARGet Kids! is a large primary care practice-based pediatric research network in Canada with ongoing data collection at well-child visits. Several sociodemographic, health, and study design factors were examined for their associations with research participation. The primary outcome was attendance of eligible research follow-up visits. The secondary outcome was time to withdrawal from the TARGet Kids! study. Generalized linear mixed effects models and Cox proportional hazard models were fitted. We have engaged parent partners in all stages of this study.

resultsA total 10,412 children with 62,655 total eligible research follow-up visits were included. Mean age at enrolment was 22 months, 52% were male, and 52% had mothers of European ethnicity. 68.4% of the participants attended at least 1 research follow-up visit. Since 2008, 6.4% of the participants have submitted a withdrawal request. Key factors associated with research participation included child age, ethnicity, maternal age, maternal education level, family income, parental employment, child diagnosis of chronic health conditions, certain study sites, and missingness in questionnaire data.

conclusionsSocioeconomic status, demographic factors, chronic conditions, and missingness in questionnaire data were associated with research participation in this large primary care practice-based cohort study of children. Results from this analysis and input from our parent partners suggested that retention strategies could include continued parent engagement, creating brand identity and communication tools, using multiple languages and avoiding redundancy in the questionnaires.

Indexed as

MothersParentsChildCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID37040376
PMCPMC10089319
OpenAlexW4364353402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.